The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A metastatic nude-mouse model of human pancreatic cancer constructed orthotopically with histologically intact patient specimens.
Open accessAbstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most intractable and least understood of all human cancers. Pancreatic cancers is the fourth-leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States with less than 2% of the patients surviving for 5 yr. In an effort to help develop more effective treatment modalities for pancreatic cancer and improve detection, we report an animal model for individual human pancreatic-cancer patients. The model involves orthotopic transplantation of histologically intact pancreatic-cancer specimens to the nude-mouse pancreas, which can result in models that resemble the clinical picture including (i) extensive local tumor growth, (ii) extension of the locally growing human pancreatic cancer to the nude-mouse stomach and duodenum, (iii) metastases of the human pancreatic tumor to the nude-mouse liver and regional lymph nodes, and (iv) distant metastases of the human pancreatic tumor to the nude-mouse adrenal gland, diaphragm, and mediastinal lymph nodes. In a series of five patient cases, a 100% take rate has been demonstrated, and of 17 mice transplanted, 15 supported tumor growth. Immunohistochemical analysis of the antigenic phenotype of the transplanted human pancreatic tumors showed a similar pattern of expression of two different human tumor-associated antigens, such as tumor-associated glycoprotein 72 and carcinoembryonic antigen in the transplanted tumors when compared with the original surgical biopsy, suggesting similarity between the two. This model should, therefore, prove valuable for treatment evaluation of individual cancer patients, as well as for evaluation of experimental treatment modalities for this disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Patient-derived tumour xenografts as models for oncology drug development
Tentler, J. J., Tan, A. C., Weekes, C. D., Jimeno, A., Leong, S., Pitts, T. M., Arcaroli, J. J., Messersmith, W. A., & Eckhardt, S. G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.61 · Cited by 1,277
Xenograft and organoid model systems in cancer research
Bleijs, M., van de Wetering, M., Clevers, H., & Drost, J. (2019) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2019101654 · Cited by 400
Patient-derived orthotopic xenografts: better mimic of metastasis than subcutaneous xenografts
Hoffman, R. M. (2015) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3972 · Cited by 425
Self-citationGold nanoclusters-assisted delivery of NGF siRNA for effective treatment of pancreatic cancer
Lei, Y., Tang, L., Xie, Y., Xianyu, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, P., Hamada, Y., Jiang, K., Zheng, W., & Jiang, X. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15130 · Cited by 336
Targeting LKB1 in Cancer – Exposing and Exploiting Vulnerabilities
Momcilovic, M., & Shackelford, D. B. (2015) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2015.261 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Fu, X., Guadagni, F., & Hoffman, R. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1992-06-15
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5645-5649
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1969705513
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A metastatic nude-mouse model of human pancreatic cancer constructed orthotopically with histologically intact patient specimens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.89.12.5645
- The paper
- Fu, X., Guadagni, F., & Hoffman, R. M. (1992). A metastatic nude-mouse model of human pancreatic cancer constructed orthotopically with histologically intact patient specimens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.12.5645
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.