The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Repair of DNA heteroduplexes containing small heterologous sequences in Escherichia coli.
Open accessAbstract
Plasmid heteroduplexes were constructed that contain 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 unpaired bases within the mnt gene. These were used to assess the efficiency of repair of small heterologous sequences ("heterologies") in DNA by the Escherichia coli Dam-directed mismatch repair system. Heteroduplexes in defined states of methylation at d(GATC) sites were used to transform a repair-proficient indicator strain (which has a mnt-lac fusion coding for a nonfunctional mnt repressor) and its isogenic mutH, -L, and -S derivatives. Using this in vivo transformation system, we scored for repair on the basis of colony color: correction in favor of the strand bearing mnt+ coding information gives rise to colonies that are white, whereas correction on the opposite strand (mnt-) yields colonies that are red when grown on MacConkey agar. Failure to repair a heterology yields colonies that are both red and white ("mixed"). The correction efficiencies of two heteroduplexes, each containing a single G.T mismatch within mnt, were also monitored for purposes of comparison. Our results show that mutHLS-dependent, methyl-directed repair of heteroduplexes with 1-, 2-, and 3-base deletions is as highly efficient as the repair of G.T mismatches. Heteroduplexes with a 4-base deletion are marginally repaired and DNA with a 5-base deletion is not detectably repaired. In addition, we show that purified MutS protein from Salmonella typhimurium, which can substitute for E. coli MutS in vivo, binds to oligonucleotide duplexes containing 1, 2, 3, and 4 unpaired bases of a sequence identical with that used for the in vivo studies. Specific binding of MutS to homoduplex DNA and to DNA that had undergone a 5-base deletion was not observed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Strand, M., Prolla, T. A., Liskay, R. M., & Petes, T. D. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/365274a0 · Cited by 1,077
DNA Mismatch Repair: Functions and Mechanisms
Iyer, R. R., Pluciennik, A., Burdett, V., & Modrich, P. L. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0404794 · Cited by 905
DNA MISMATCH REPAIR AND GENETIC INSTABILITY
Harfe, B. D., & Jinks-Robertson, S. (2000) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.359 · Cited by 608
Thompson, J. R. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.9.2083 · Cited by 448
Bacterial contingency loci: the role of simple sequence DNA repeats in bacterial adaptation
Moxon, R., Bayliss, C., & Hood, D. (2006) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090442 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Parker, B. O., & Marinus, M. G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1730-1734
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2090657834
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repair of DNA heteroduplexes containing small heterologous sequences in Escherichia coli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.89.5.1730
- The paper
- Parker, B. O., & Marinus, M. G. (1992). Repair of DNA heteroduplexes containing small heterologous sequences in Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.5.1730
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.