Ultraviolet-induced mutations in Cockayne syndrome cells are primarily caused by cyclobutane dimer photoproducts while repair of other photoproducts is normal.
Open accessAbstract
We compared the contribution to mutagenesis in Cockayne syndrome (CS) cells of the major class of UV photoproducts, the cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer, to that of other DNA photoproducts by using the mutagenesis shuttle vector pZ189. Lymphoblastoid cell lines from the DNA repair-deficient disorders CS and xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) and a normal line were transfected with UV-treated pZ189. Cyclobutane dimers were selectively removed before transfection by photoreactivation (PR), leaving nondimer photoproducts intact. After UV exposure and replication in CS and XP cells, plasmid survival was abnormally reduced and mutation frequency was abnormally elevated. After PR, plasmid survival increased and mutation frequency in CS cells decreased to normal levels but remained abnormal in XP cells. Sequence analysis of > 200 mutant plasmids showed that with CS cells a major mutational hot spot was caused by unrepaired cyclobutane dimers. These data indicate that with both CS and XP cyclobutane dimers are major photoproducts generating reduced plasmid survival and increased mutation frequency. However, unlike XP, CS cells are proficient in repair of nondimer photoproducts. Since XP but not CS patients have a high frequency of UV-induced skin cancers, our data suggest that prevention of UV-induce skin cancers is associated with proficient repair of nondimer photoproducts.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An episomal plasmid (pZ189), irradiated with UV and passed through CS cells, showed increased levels of mutations.
“In contrast, an episomal plasmid (pZ189), irradiated with UV and passed through CS cells, showed increased levels of mutations (14, 15).”
From Why Cockayne syndrome patients do not get cancer despite their DNA repair deficiency (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
These results validate the use of duplex sequencing for the detection of UV-induced mutagenesis.
“These results are consistent with previous reports of UV-induced mutagenesis in reporter genes (11, 13 -15) and validate our use of duplex sequencing for the detection of UV-induced mutagenesis.”
From Why Cockayne syndrome patients do not get cancer despite their DNA repair deficiency (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Brash, D. E., Seetharam, S., Kraemer, K. H., Seidman, M. M., & Bredberg, A. (1987) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.84.11.3782 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- [3]Cleaver, J. & Kraemer, K. H. (1989) in The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease, eds. Scriver, C. R., Beaudet, A. L., Sly, W. S. & Valle, D. (McGraw–Hill, New York), 6th Ed., pp. 2949-2971.
- [11]Arlett, C. F. & Cole, J. (1986) in Genetic Toxicology of Environmental Chemicals, eds. Ramel, C., Lambert, B. & Magnusson, J. (Liss, New York), Vol. 2A, pp. 237–244.
- [15]Venema, J., Mullenders, L. H. F., Natarajan, A. T., van Zeeland, A. A. & Mayne, L. V. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 4707–4711.
- [23]Peden, K. W. C., Pipas, J. M., Pearson-White, S. & Nathan, D. (1980) Science 209, 1392–1396.
- [22]Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E. F. & Sambrook, J. (1982) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, Plainview, NY).
- [32]Kraemer, K. H., Seetharam, S., Protić-Sabjlić, M., Brash, D. E., Bredberg, A. & Seidman, M. M. (1988) in Mechanisms and Consequences of DNA Damage Processing, eds. Friedberg, E. C. & Hanawalt, P. C. (Liss, New York), Vol. 83, pp. 325-335.
- [33]Bredberg, A., Kraemer, K. H. & Seidman, M. M. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 8273–8277.
- [36]Brash, D. E., Seetharam, S., Kraemer, K. H., Seidman, M. M. & Bredberg, A. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 3782-3786.
- [37]Glickman, B. W., Schaaper, R. M., Haseltine, W. A., Dunn, R. L. & Brash, D. E. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 6945–6949.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cancer in xeroderma pigmentosum and related disorders of DNA repair
Cleaver, J. E. (2005) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1652 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Formation and processing of UV photoproducts: effects of DNA sequence and chromatin environment
Pfeifer, G. P. (1997) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1997.tb08560.x · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Nucleotide excision repair and cancer
Leibeling, D., Laspe, P., & Emmert, S. (2006) · Journal of Molecular Histology · doi:10.1007/s10735-006-9041-x · Cited by 164 · see citing works
DNA repair diseases: what do they tell us about Cancer and aging?
Menck, C. F., & Munford, V. (2014) · Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1590/s1415-47572014000200008 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Cockayne syndrome in adults: Review with clinical and pathologic study of a new case
Rapin, I., Weidenheim, K., Lindenbaum, Y., Rosenbaum, P., Merchant, S. N., Krishna, S., & Dickson, D. W. (2006) · Journal of Child Neurology · doi:10.1177/08830738060210110101 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Kraemer, K. H., Levy, D. D., Parris, C. N., Gozukara, E. M., Moriwaki, S., Adelberg, S., & Seidman, M. M. (1994) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.1994.17 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationSomatic mutation theory, DNA repair rates, and the molecular epidemiology of p53 mutations
Holmquist, G. P., & Gao, S. (1997) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/s1383-5742(96)00045-2 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
DNA repair mechanisms protect our genome from carcinogenesis
Moraes, M. C. S. (2012) · Frontiers in Bioscience · doi:10.2741/3992 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Why Cockayne syndrome patients do not get cancer despite their DNA repair deficiency
Reid-Bayliss, K. S., Arron, S. T., Loeb, L. A., Bezrookove, V., & Cleaver, J. E. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1610020113 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
- Authors
- Parris, C. N., & Kraemer, K. H.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 7260-7264
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC47116
- OpenAlex
- W1975290514
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (Z01BC004517)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
- Keywords
- Cockayne syndrome, xeroderma pigmentosum, cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, DNA photoproducts, photoreactivation, DNA repair, UV-induced skin cancer, mutational hotspots
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, Cells, Cultured, Cockayne Syndrome, DNA Repair, Genes, Bacterial, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Plasmids, Pyrimidine Dimers, Ultraviolet Rays, Xeroderma Pigmentosum, Mutagenesis, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review