Cited by 58DNA Repair MechanismsCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentSkin Protection and Aging

Ultraviolet-induced mutations in Cockayne syndrome cells are primarily caused by cyclobutane dimer photoproducts while repair of other photoproducts is normal.

Open access
Parris, C N, Kraemer, K H·1993·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We compared the contribution to mutagenesis in Cockayne syndrome (CS) cells of the major class of UV photoproducts, the cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer, to that of other DNA photoproducts by using the mutagenesis shuttle vector pZ189. Lymphoblastoid cell lines from the DNA repair-deficient disorders CS and xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) and a normal line were transfected with UV-treated pZ189. Cyclobutane dimers were selectively removed before transfection by photoreactivation (PR), leaving nondimer photoproducts intact. After UV exposure and replication in CS and XP cells, plasmid survival was abnormally reduced and mutation frequency was abnormally elevated. After PR, plasmid survival increased and mutation frequency in CS cells decreased to normal levels but remained abnormal in XP cells. Sequence analysis of > 200 mutant plasmids showed that with CS cells a major mutational hot spot was caused by unrepaired cyclobutane dimers. These data indicate that with both CS and XP cyclobutane dimers are major photoproducts generating reduced plasmid survival and increased mutation frequency. However, unlike XP, CS cells are proficient in repair of nondimer photoproducts. Since XP but not CS patients have a high frequency of UV-induced skin cancers, our data suggest that prevention of UV-induce skin cancers is associated with proficient repair of nondimer photoproducts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.90.15.7260

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [3]Cleaver, J. & Kraemer, K. H. (1989) in The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease, eds. Scriver, C. R., Beaudet, A. L., Sly, W. S. & Valle, D. (McGraw–Hill, New York), 6th Ed., pp. 2949-2971.
  2. [11]Arlett, C. F. & Cole, J. (1986) in Genetic Toxicology of Environmental Chemicals, eds. Ramel, C., Lambert, B. & Magnusson, J. (Liss, New York), Vol. 2A, pp. 237–244.
  3. [15]Venema, J., Mullenders, L. H. F., Natarajan, A. T., van Zeeland, A. A. & Mayne, L. V. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 4707–4711.
  4. [23]Peden, K. W. C., Pipas, J. M., Pearson-White, S. & Nathan, D. (1980) Science 209, 1392–1396.
  5. [22]Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E. F. & Sambrook, J. (1982) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, Plainview, NY).
  6. [32]Kraemer, K. H., Seetharam, S., Protić-Sabjlić, M., Brash, D. E., Bredberg, A. & Seidman, M. M. (1988) in Mechanisms and Consequences of DNA Damage Processing, eds. Friedberg, E. C. & Hanawalt, P. C. (Liss, New York), Vol. 83, pp. 325-335.
  7. [33]Bredberg, A., Kraemer, K. H. & Seidman, M. M. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 8273–8277.
  8. [36]Brash, D. E., Seetharam, S., Kraemer, K. H., Seidman, M. M. & Bredberg, A. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 3782-3786.
  9. [37]Glickman, B. W., Schaaper, R. M., Haseltine, W. A., Dunn, R. L. & Brash, D. E. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 6945–6949.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parris, C. N., & Kraemer, K. H.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1993-08
Volume
90
Issue
15
Pages
7260-7264
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1975290514
Cited by
58
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (Z01BC004517)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
Cockayne syndrome, xeroderma pigmentosum, cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, DNA photoproducts, photoreactivation, DNA repair, UV-induced skin cancer, mutational hotspots
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Cells, Cultured, Cockayne Syndrome, DNA Repair, Genes, Bacterial, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Plasmids, Pyrimidine Dimers, Ultraviolet Rays, Xeroderma Pigmentosum, Mutagenesis, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review