The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preferential repair of ionizing radiation-induced damage in the transcribed strand of an active human gene is defective in Cockayne syndrome.
Open accessAbstract
Cells from patients with Cockayne syndrome (CS), which are sensitive to killing by UV although overall damage removal appears normal, are specifically defective in repair of UV damage in actively transcribed genes. Because several CS strains display cross-sensitivity to killing by ionizing radiation, we examined whether ionizing radiation-induced damage in active genes is preferentially repaired by normal cells and whether the radiosensitivity of CS cells can be explained by a defect in this process. We found that ionizing radiation-induced damage was repaired more rapidly in the transcriptionally active metallothionein IIA (MTIIA) gene than in the inactive MTIIB gene or in the genome overall in normal cells as a result of faster repair on the transcribed strand of MTIIA. Cells of the radiosensitive CS strain CS1AN are completely defective in this strand-selective repair of ionizing radiation-induced damage, although their overall repair rate appears normal. CS3BE cells, which are intermediate in radiosensitivity, do exhibit more rapid repair of the transcribed strand but at a reduced rate compared to normal cells. Xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group A cells, which are hypersensitive to UV light because of a defect in the nucleotide excision repair pathway but do not show increased sensitivity to ionizing radiation, preferentially repair ionizing radiation-induced damage on the transcribed strand of MTIIA. Thus, the ability to rapidly repair ionizing radiation-induced damage in actively transcribing genes correlates with cell survival. Our results extend the generality of preferential repair in active genes to include damage other than bulky lesions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Selby, C. P., Witkin, E. M., & Sancar, A. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.24.11574 · Cited by 215
Cited by
Oxidative DNA damage and disease: induction, repair and significance
Evans, M. D., Dizdaroglu, M., & Cooke, M. S. (2004) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2003.11.001 · Cited by 1,372
Brca1 Controls Homology-Directed DNA Repair
Moynahan, M. E., Chiu, J. W., Koller, B. H., & Jasin, M. (1999) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80202-6 · Cited by 1,245
Molecular mechanism of nucleotide excision repair
de Laat, W. L., Jaspers, N. G. J., & Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (1999) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.13.7.768 · Cited by 1,122
Sugasawa, K., Ng, J. M. Y., Masutani, C., Iwai, S., van der Spek, P. J., Eker, A. P. M., Hanaoka, F., Bootsma, D., & Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (1998) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80132-x · Cited by 899
Nucleotide excision repair and human syndromes
de Boer, J., & Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (2000) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/21.3.453 · Cited by 674
Metadata
- Authors
- Leadon, S. A., & Cooper, P. K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1993-11-15
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 10499-10503
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2051883249
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preferential repair of ionizing radiation-induced damage in the transcribed strand of an active human gene is defective in Cockayne syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.90.22.10499
- The paper
- Leadon, S. A., & Cooper, P. K. (1993). Preferential repair of ionizing radiation-induced damage in the transcribed strand of an active human gene is defective in Cockayne syndrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.22.10499
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.