The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential induction of neurotensin and c-fos gene expression by typical versus atypical antipsychotics.
Open accessAbstract
Precise neural mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology and pharmacotherapy of psychotic disorders remain largely unknown. Present studies investigated the effects of various antipsychotic drugs on expression of the gene encoding the purported endogenous antipsychotic-like peptide neurotensin (NT) in striatal regions of the rat brain. The results demonstrate that several clinically efficacious antipsychotic drugs selectively and specifically increase expression of NT/neuromedin N (NT/N) mRNA in the shell of the nucleus accumbens, a region of the forebrain associated with limbic systems. On the other hand, only typical antipsychotics that cause a high incidence of acute motor side effects increased the expression of NT/N mRNA in the dorsolateral striatum, an extrapyramidal region primarily involved in motor control. In addition, it appears that distinct mechanisms may be involved in the effects of antipsychotics on NT/N gene expression in the dorsolateral striatum versus the accumbal shell. Thus neuroleptic-induced increases in NT/N mRNA expression in the dorsolateral striatum were preceded by a rapid and transient activation of c-fos mRNA, whereas none of the antipsychotics affected c-fos mRNA expression in the accumbal shell. The anatomical characteristics of NT/N gene expression induced by typical versus atypical antipsychotics raise the possibility that increased activity of specific NT neurons may contribute to the therapeutic effects (NT neurons in the accumbal shell) or motor side effects (NT neurons in the dorsolateral striatum) of these drugs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dopamine Receptor Binding Predicts Clinical and Pharmacological Potencies of Antischizophrenic Drugs
Creese, I., Burt, D. R., & Snyder, S. H. (1976) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3854 · Cited by 2,220
Antipsychotic drug doses and neuroleptic/dopamine receptors
SEEMAN, P., LEE, T., CHAU-WONG, M., & WONG, K. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/261717a0 · Cited by 1,622
Alheid, G. F., & Heimer, L. (1988) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(88)90217-5 · Cited by 1,217
Cited by
Fredholm, B. B., Bättig, K., Holmén, J., Nehlig, A., & Zvartau, E. E. (1999) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01396-6 · Cited by 2,624
Mechanisms of action of atypical antipsychotic drugs: a critical analysis
Kinon, B. J., & Lieberman, J. A. (1996) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02245602 · Cited by 317
The dopaminergic hyper-responsiveness of the shell of the nucleus accumbens is hormone-dependent
Barrot, M., Marinelli, M., Abrous, D. N., Rougé‐Pont, F., Le Moal, M., & Piazza, P. V. (2000) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00996.x · Cited by 210
The human basal forebrain. Part II
Heimer, L., de Olmos, J. S., Alheid, G. F., Pearson, J., Sakamoto, N., Shinoda, K., Marksteiner, J., & Switzer, R. C. (1999) · Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy · doi:10.1016/s0924-8196(99)80024-4 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Merchant, K. M., & Dorsa, D. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1993-04-15
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3447-3451
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2015211750
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential induction of neurotensin and c-fos gene expression by typical versus atypical antipsychotics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.90.8.3447
- The paper
- Merchant, K. M., & Dorsa, D. M. (1993). Differential induction of neurotensin and c-fos gene expression by typical versus atypical antipsychotics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.8.3447
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
