The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Growth arrest by induction of p53 in DNA damaged keratinocytes is bypassed by human papillomavirus 16 E7
Abstract
Cellular tumor suppressors p53 and Rb play an important role in controlling cell proliferation. Inactivation of these tumor suppressor proteins can occur by gene mutation or by association with oncoproteins from the small DNA tumor viruses. One function of p53 is in regulating cell cycle check-point control after DNA damage. To dissect the pathways by which p53 and Rb may act, the E6 and E7 oncogenes of human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6 and 16 were introduced into primary human epithelial cells by retroviral transfer vector, and cells were assayed for growth arrest after DNA damage induced by actinomycin D. The E6 or E7 oncogenes from the low-risk HPV6 had no affect on growth arrest, p53 protein levels increased, Rb protein levels decreased, and Rb was predominantly in the hypophosphorylated state similar to vector-infected cells. Either the E6 or the E7 oncogene from the high-risk HPV16 abrogated growth arrest. Cells expressing HPV16 E6 (16E6) were severely reduced in p53 protein levels that did not increase detectably after DNA damage, Rb protein levels did not decrease, and hyperphosphorylated Rb was present. After DNA damage in cells expressing 16E7 p53 levels increased, and Rb protein levels decreased; however, Rb was predominantly in the hyperphosphorylated state. Even though p53 protein levels increased in response to DNA damage in cells expressing 16E7, G1 growth arrest was bypassed. This suggests that the circuitry controlling the growth arrest signal after DNA damage may be interconnected between the p53 and Rb pathways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“only high-risk E7s can target all three of the pRB family proteins for degradation”
From The Not-So-Good, the Bad and the Ugly: HPV E5, E6 and E7 Oncoproteins in the Orchestration of Carcinogenesis (2021) · cites this paper as [131]
In the citing paper
“it has been suggested that the inability of low-risk HPV types to drive robust basal cell proliferation is because they can only efficiently induce the degradation of p130, which regulates cell cycle entry in the upper epithelial layers, but they cannot target p107 and p105”
From The Not-So-Good, the Bad and the Ugly: HPV E5, E6 and E7 Oncoproteins in the Orchestration of Carcinogenesis (2021) · cites this paper as [131]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours
Donehower, L. A., Harvey, M., Slagle, B. L., McArthur, M. J., Montgomery, C. A., Butel, J. S., & Bradley, A. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/356215a0 · Cited by 4,649
The human papilloma virus-16 E7-oncoprotein is able to bind to the retinoblastoma gene product
Dyson, N., Howley, P. M., Münger, K., & Harlow, E. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2537532 · Cited by 3,017
Chen, P.-L., Scully, P., Shew, J.-Y., Wang, J. Y. J., & Lee, W.-H. (1989) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90517-5 · Cited by 952
Cell cycle dependent regulation of phosphorylation of the human retinoblastoma gene product
Mihara, K., Cao, X.-R., Yen, A., Chandler, S., Driscoll, B., Murphree, A. L., T'Ang, A., & Fung, Y.-K. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2588006 · Cited by 449
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [11]Kuerbitz, S. J., Plunkett, B. S., Walsh, W. V. & Kastan, M. B. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 7491–7495.
- [27]Kessis, T. D., Slebos, R. J., Nelson, W. G., Kastan, M. B., Plunkett, B. S., Han, S. M., Lorincz, A. T., Hedrick, L. & Cho, K. R. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 3988–3992.
- [31]Trask, D. K. & Muller, M. T. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 1417–1421.
Cited by
Sherr, C. J. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5293.1672 · Cited by 5,379
Kiyono, T., Foster, S. A., Koop, J. I., McDougall, J. K., Galloway, D. A., & Klingelhutz, A. J. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23962 · Cited by 1,206
Self-citationTargeted disruption of the three Rb-related genes leads to loss of G 1 control and immortalization
Sage, J., Mulligan, G. J., Attardi, L. D., Miller, A., Chen, S., Williams, B., Theodorou, E., & Jacks, T. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.843200 · Cited by 582
pRB plays an essential role in cell cycle arrest induced by DNA damage
Harrington, E. A., Bruce, J. L., Harlow, E., & Dyson, N. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.20.11945 · Cited by 242
p53 Regulation of G 2 Checkpoint Is Retinoblastoma Protein Dependent
Flatt, P. M., Tang, L. J., Scatena, C. D., Szak, S. T., & Pietenpol, J. A. (2000) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.20.12.4210-4223.2000 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Demers, G. W., Foster, S. A., Halbert, C. L., & Galloway, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Cancer Biology Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98104.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1994-05-10
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4382-4386
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growth arrest by induction of p53 in DNA damaged keratinocytes is bypassed by human papillomavirus 16 E7. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.91.10.4382
- The paper
- Demers, G. W., Foster, S. A., Halbert, C. L., & Galloway, D. A. (1994). Growth arrest by induction of p53 in DNA damaged keratinocytes is bypassed by human papillomavirus 16 E7. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.10.4382