Cited by 159Evolution and Genetic DynamicsMorphological variations and asymmetryEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Morphological evolution through complex domains of fitness.

Open access
Niklas, K J·1994·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Computer simulated phenotypic walks through multi-dimensional fitness-landscapes indicate that (i) the number of phenotypes capable of reconciling conflicting morphological requirements increases in proportion to the number of manifold functional obligations an organism must perform to grow, survive, and reproduce, and (ii) walks over multi-task fitness-landscapes require fewer but larger phenotypic transformations than those through single-task landscapes. These results were determined by (i) simulating a "morphospace" containing 200,000 phenotypes reminiscent of early Paleozoic vascular sporophytes, (ii) evaluating the capacity of each morphology to perform each of three tasks (light interception, mechanical support, and reproduction) as well as the ability to reconcile the conflicting morphological requirements for the four combinatorial permutations of these tasks, (iii) simulating the walks obtaining all phenotypic maxima or optima within the seven "fitness-landscapes," and (iv) computing the mean morphological variation attending these walks. The results of these simulations, whose credibility is discussed in the context of early vascular land-plant evolution, suggest that both the number and the accessibility of phenotypic optima increase as the number of functional obligations contributing to total fitness increases (i.e., as the complexity of optimal phenotypes increases, the fitnesses of optima fall closer to the mean fitness of all the phenotypes under selection).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.91.15.6772

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A morphospace is a phenotype space where a small set of quantitative traits can be defined as axes.

    “Awell established concept where such questions are addressed involves the use of a morphospace [32-36] namely a phenotype space where a small set of quantitative traits can be defined as the axes.”

    From On the origins of hierarchy in complex networks (2013) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niklas, K. J.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Niklas, K J
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1994-07-19
Volume
91
Issue
15
Pages
6772-6779
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2071426562
Cited by
159
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
morphological evolution, fitness landscape, morphospace, morphological complexity, light interception, mechanical support, plant reproduction
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Biological Evolution, Phenotype, Plants, Selection, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review