Cited by 20Complex Network Analysis TechniquesSoftware Engineering ResearchLanguage and cultural evolution

Convergent Evolutionary Paths in Biological and Technological Networks

Open access
Solé, Ricard V., Valverde, Sergi, Rodriguez-Caso, Carlos·2011·Evolution: Education and Outreach

Abstract

Technology seems to follow a different type of evolutionary dynamic when compared with biological systems. As pointed out by Francois Jacob, evolution takes place by means of extensive tinkering and does not foresee the future. Engineers will typically have a well-defined purpose and are not—in principle—constrained by the available technological constraints. However, the truth is that technological change shares much more than we might suspect with the patterns and processes displayed by evolution. Using case studies from both protein maps and large-scale software networks, we show that several key traits, such as scale-free structure and modularity, are shared by both man-made and biological evolving systems. Surprisingly, we find convergent evolution in several key features of software systems, indicating that strong constraints are at work. Such constraints force engineers to extensively reuse already constructed parts, thus de facto tinkering with their designs in a way similar to the duplication–diversification mechanism driving genome growth. The evolution of these systems reveals that well-defined patterns are obtained “for free.” Some of them can be properly interpreted as technological spandrels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12052-011-0346-1

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence for convergent evolution challenges the idea that an alternative biosphere would look alien to ours.

    “The evidence for convergent evolution has challenged the idea that an alternative biosphere would look alien to ours [10,26,27].”

    From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [27]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 108 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solé, R. V., Valverde, S., & Rodriguez-Caso, C.
Affiliations
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Solé, Ricard V.
Venue
Evolution: Education and Outreach
Published
2011-07-22
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
415-426
ISSN
  • 1936-6426 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-6434
OpenAlex
W2002268851
Cited by
20
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Evolution Education and Outreach (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Santa Fe Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
Keywords
convergent evolution, technological evolution, biological networks, software networks, protein interaction maps, scale-free networks, network modularity, tinkering, code reuse, technological constraints, whole-genome duplication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review