Cited by 438Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding

Serum amyloid P component prevents proteolysis of the amyloid fibrils of Alzheimer disease and systemic amyloidosis

Open access
Tennent, G A, Lovat, L B, Pepys, M B·1995·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Extracellular deposition of amyloid fibrils is responsible for the pathology in the systemic amyloidoses and probably also in Alzheimer disease [Haass, C. & Selkoe, D. J. (1993) Cell 75, 1039-1042] and type II diabetes mellitus [Lorenzo, A., Razzaboni, B., Weir, G. C. & Yankner, B. A. (1994) Nature (London) 368, 756-760]. The fibrils themselves are relatively resistant to proteolysis in vitro but amyloid deposits do regress in vivo, usually with clinical benefit, if new amyloid fibril formation can be halted. Serum amyloid P component (SAP) binds to all types of amyloid fibrils and is a universal constituent of amyloid deposits, including the plaques, amorphous amyloid beta protein deposits and neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer disease [Coria, F., Castano, E., Prelli, F., Larrondo-Lillo, M., van Duinen, S., Shelanski, M. L. & Frangione, B. (1988) Lab. Invest. 58, 454-458; Duong, T., Pommier, E. C. & Scheibel, A. B. (1989) Acta Neuropathol. 78, 429-437]. Here we show that SAP prevents proteolysis of the amyloid fibrils of Alzheimer disease, of systemic amyloid A amyloidosis and of systemic monoclonal light chain amyloidosis and may thereby contribute to their persistence in vivo. SAP is not an enzyme inhibitor and is protective only when bound to the fibrils. Interference with binding of SAP to amyloid fibrils in vivo is thus an attractive therapeutic objective, achievement of which should promote regression of the deposits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4299

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1]Pepys, M. B. (1994) in Samter's Immunologic Diseases, eds. Frank, M. M., Austen, K. F., Claman, H. N. & Unanue, E. R. (Little, Brown, Boston), 5th Ed., pp. 637–655.
  2. [5]Maggio, J. E., Stimson, E. R., Ghilardi, J. R., Allen, C. J., Dahl, C. E., Whitcomb, D. C., Vigna, S. R., Vinters, H. V., Labenski, M. E. & Mantyh, P. W. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5462–5466.
  3. [16]Skinner, M., Pepys, M. B., Cohen, A. S., Heller, L. M. & Lian, J. B. (1980) in Amyloid and Amyloidosis, eds. Glenner, G. G., Pinho e Costa, P. & Falcao de Freitas, F. (Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam), pp. 384–391.
  4. [21]Pepys, M. B. (1986) in Amyloidosis, eds. Marrink, J. & van Rijswijk, M. H. (Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), pp. 43– 50.
  5. [23]Pepys, M. B., Rademacher, T. W., Amatayakul-Chantler, S., Williams, P., Noble, G. E., Hutchinson, W. L., Hawkins, P. N., Nelson, S. R., Gallimore, J. R., Herbert, J., Hutton, T. & Dwek, R. A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 5602–5606.
  6. [30]Soutar, A. K., Hawkins, P. N., Vigushin, D. M., Tennent, G. A., Booth, S. E., Hutton, T., Nguyen, O., Totty, N. F., Feest, T. G., Hsuan, J. J. & Pepys, M. B. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 7389-7393.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tennent, G. A., Lovat, L. B., & Pepys, M. B.
Affiliations
Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1995-05-09
Volume
92
Issue
10
Pages
4299-4303
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2061033316
Cited by
438
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 26
FWCI
13.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
Keywords
serum amyloid P component, amyloid fibrils, proteolysis, Alzheimer's disease, systemic amyloidosis, amyloid A amyloidosis, amyloid binding, amyloid plaques, amyloid-beta, neurofibrillary tangles, type 2 diabetes
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Serum Amyloid A Protein, Amyloidosis, Chymotrypsin, Galactose, Humans, Kinetics, Protein Binding, Spleen, Trypsin, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Neurofibrillary Tangles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review