Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional expression of low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein is controlled by receptor-associated protein in vivo.

Willnow, T E, Armstrong, S A, Hammer, R E, Herz, J·1995·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The 39-kDa receptor-associated protein (RAP) associates with the multifunctional low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-related protein (LRP) and thereby prevents the binding of all known ligands, including alpha 2-macroglobulin and chylomicron remnants. RAP is predominantly localized in the endoplasmic reticulum, raising the possibility that it functions as a chaperone or escort protein in the biosynthesis or intracellular transport of LRP. Here we have used gene targeting to show that RAP promotes the expression of functional LRP in vivo. The amount of mature, processed LRP is reduced in liver and brain of RAP-deficient mice. As a result, hepatic clearance of alpha 2-macroglobulin is impaired and remnant lipoproteins accumulate in the plasma of RAP-deficient mice that also lack functional LDL receptors. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that RAP stabilizes LRP within the secretory pathway. They also suggest a further mechanism by which the activity of an endocytic receptor may be modulated in vivo.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4537

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [4]Kowal, R. C., Herz, J., Goldstein, J. L., Esser, V. & Brown, M. S. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 5810–5814.
  2. [8]Bu, G., Williams, S., Strickland, D. K. & Schwartz, A. L. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 7427–7431.
  3. [7]Beisiegel, U., Weber, W. & Bengtsson-Olivecrona, G. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 8342–8346.
  4. [12]Orth, K., Madison, E. L., Ġething, M.-J., Sambrook, J. F. & Herz, J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 7422–7426.
  5. [14]Warshawsky, I., Broze, G. J., Jr., & Schwartz, A. L. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6664–6668.
  6. [18]Hofer, F., Gruenberger, M., Kowalski, H., Machat, H., Huettinger, M., Kuechler, E. & Blaas, D. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 1839–1842.
  7. [27]Orlando, R. A., Kerjaschki, D., Kurihura, H., Biemesderfer, D. & Farquhar, M. G. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 6698– 6702.
  8. [36]Bradley, A. (1987) in Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells: A Practical Approach, ed. Robertson, E. J. (IRL, Oxford), pp. 113–151.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Willnow, T. E., Armstrong, S. A., Hammer, R. E., & Herz, J.
Affiliations
Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235, USA.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1995-05-09
Volume
92
Issue
10
Pages
4537-4541
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
228
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review