The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conserved catalytic machinery and the prediction of a common fold for several families of glycosyl hydrolases.
Open accessAbstract
The regions surrounding the catalytic amino acids previously identified in a few "retaining" O-glycosyl hydrolases (EC 3.2.1) have been analyzed by hydrophobic cluster analysis and have been used to define sequence motifs. These motifs have been found in more than 150 glycosyl hydrolase sequences representing at least eight established protein families that act on a large variety of substrates. This allows the localization and the precise role of the catalytic residues (nucleophile and acid catalyst) to be predicted for each of these enzymes, including several lysosomal glycosidases. An identical arrangement of the catalytic nucleophile was also found for S-glycosyl hydrolases (myrosinases; EC 3.2.3.1) for which the acid catalyst is lacking. A (beta/alpha)8 barrel structure has been reported for two of the eight families of proteins that have been grouped. It is suggested that the six other families also share this fold at their catalytic domain. These enzymes illustrate how evolutionary events led to a wide diversification of substrate specificity with a similar disposition of identical catalytic residues onto the same ancestral (beta/alpha)8 barrel structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New families in the classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities
Henrissat, B., & Bairoch, A. (1993) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj2930781 · Cited by 1,974
Self-citationLaine, R. A. (1994) · Glycobiology · doi:10.1093/glycob/4.6.759 · Cited by 466
Cited by
Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology
Lynd, L. R., Weimer, P. J., van Zyl, W. H., & Pretorius, I. S. (2002) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.66.3.506-577.2002 · Cited by 4,726
Payne, C. M., Knott, B. C., Mayes, H. B., Hansson, H., Himmel, M. E., Sandgren, M., Ståhlberg, J., & Beckham, G. T. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500351c · Cited by 855
Immune regulation by microbiome metabolites
Kim, C. H. (2018) · Immunology · doi:10.1111/imm.12930 · Cited by 375
Complex Carbohydrate Utilization by the Healthy Human Microbiome
Cantarel, B. L., Lombard, V., & Henrissat, B. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028742 · Cited by 378
Self-citationHehemann, J.-H., Kelly, A. G., Pudlo, N. A., Martens, E. C., & Boraston, A. B. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211002109 · Cited by 338
Metadata
- Authors
- Henrissat, B., Callebaut, I., Fabrega, S., Lehn, P., Mornon, J. P., & Davies, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1995-07-18
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 7090-7094
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2170264257
- Cited by
- 598
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conserved catalytic machinery and the prediction of a common fold for several families of glycosyl hydrolases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.92.15.7090
- The paper
- Henrissat, B., Callebaut, I., Fabrega, S., Lehn, P., Mornon, J. P., & Davies, G. (1995). Conserved catalytic machinery and the prediction of a common fold for several families of glycosyl hydrolases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.15.7090
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.