The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Functional anatomy of human eyeblink conditioning determined with regional cerebral glucose metabolism and positron-emission tomography.
Open accessAbstract
Relative cerebral glucose metabolism was examined with positron-emission tomography (PET) as a measure of neuronal activation during performance of the classically conditioned eyeblink response in 12 young adult subjects. Each subject received three sessions: (i) a control session with PET scan in which unpaired presentations of the tone conditioned stimulus and corneal airpuff unconditioned stimulus were administered, (ii) a paired training session to allow associative learning to occur, and (iii) a paired test session with PET scan. Brain regions exhibiting learning-related activation were identified as those areas that showed significant differences in glucose metabolism between the unpaired control condition and well-trained state in the 9 subjects who met the learning criterion. Areas showing significant activation included bilateral sites in the inferior cerebellar cortex/deep nuclei, anterior cerebellar vermis, contralateral cerebellar cortex and pontine tegmentum, ipsilateral inferior thalamus/red nucleus, ipsilateral hippocampal formation, ipsilateral lateral temporal cortex, and bilateral ventral striatum. Among all subjects, including those who did not meet the learning criterion, metabolic changes in ipsilateral cerebellar nuclei, bilateral cerebellar cortex, anterior vermis, contralateral pontine tegmentum, ipsilateral hippocampal formation, and bilateral striatum correlated with degree of learning. The localization to cerebellum and its associated brainstem circuitry is consistent with neurobiological studies in the rabbit model of eyeblink classical conditioning and neuropsychological studies in brain-damaged humans. In addition, these data support a role for the hippocampus in conditioning and suggest that the ventral striatum may also be involved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome
Schmahmann, J. (1998) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/121.4.561 · Cited by 3,230
Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning
Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.483 · Cited by 3,147
Functional topography in the human cerebellum: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies
STOODLEY, C., & SCHMAHMANN, J. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.039 · Cited by 2,183
(2009) · Cited by 2,013
Diamond, A. (2000) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00117 · Cited by 1,175
Brain systems mediating aversive conditioning: an event-related fMRI study
Büchel, C., Morris, J., Dolan, R. J., & Friston, K. J. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80476-6 · Cited by 951
The Neuroscience of Mammalian Associative Learning
Fanselow, M. S., & Poulos, A. M. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070213 · Cited by 683
Postuma, R. B., & Dagher, A. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj088 · Cited by 579
Human Fear Conditioning and Extinction in Neuroimaging: A Systematic Review
Sehlmeyer, C., Schöning, S., Zwitserlood, P., Pfleiderer, B., Kircher, T., Arolt, V., & Konrad, C. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005865 · Cited by 543
Attention function and dysfunction in autism
Allen, G. (2001) · Frontiers in Bioscience · doi:10.2741/allen · Cited by 256
Increased ventral striatal BOLD activity during non-drug reward anticipation in cannabis users
Nestor, L., Hester, R., & Garavan, H. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.022 · Cited by 186
Roozendaal, B., de Quervain, D. J.-F., Ferry, B., Setlow, B., & McGaugh, J. L. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-07-02518.2001 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Logan, C. G., & Grafton, S. T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 7500-7504
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2005913098
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.