Cited by 557Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZProtein Structure and DynamicsProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

The WW domain of Yes-associated protein binds a proline-rich ligand that differs from the consensus established for Src homology 3-binding modules.

Open access
Chen, H I, Sudol, M·1995·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The WW domain has previously been described as a motif of 38 semiconserved residues found in seemingly unrelated proteins, such as dystrophin, Yes-associated protein (YAP), and two transcriptional regulators, Rsp-5 and FE65. The molecular function of the WW domain has been unknown until this time. Using a functional screen of a cDNA expression library, we have identified two putative ligands of the WW domain of YAP, which we named WBP-1 and WBP-2. Peptide sequence comparison between the two partial clones revealed a homologous region consisting of a proline-rich domain followed by a tyrosine residue (with the shared sequence PPPPY), which we shall call the PY motif. Binding assays and site-specific mutagenesis have shown that the PY motif binds with relatively high affinity and specificity to the WW domain of YAP, with the preliminary consensus XPPXY being critical for binding. Herein, we have implicated the WW domain with a role in mediating protein-protein interactions, as a variant of the paradigm set by Src homology 3 domains and their proline-rich ligands.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.92.17.7819

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • WW domains bind to proteins containing a minimal consensus sequence of XPPXY.

    “WW domains are small modules of 35 to 40 amino acids that are characterized by four well conserved aromatic residues of which two are tryptophans, that bind to proteins containing a minimal consensus sequence of XPPXY (Bork and Sudol, 1994; Chen and Sudol, 1995).”

    From LRAD3, A Novel Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor Family Member That Modulates Amyloid Precursor Protein Trafficking (2011) · cites this paper as Chen and Sudol, 1995

    The Abstract reports that the WW domain of YAP binds ligands with a PY motif and that a preliminary XPPXY consensus is critical for binding. The claim extends that result from YAP’s WW domain to WW domains generally and omits the preliminary qualification. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Bar-Sagi D., Rotin D., Batzer A., Mandiyan V., Schlessinger J. SH3 domains direct cellular localization of signaling molecules. Cell. 1993 Jul 16;74(1):83–91. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90296-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. Birge R. B., Hanafusa H. Closing in on SH2 specificity. Science. 1993 Dec 3;262(5139):1522–1524. doi: 10.1126/science.7504323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  3. Blaikie P., Immanuel D., Wu J., Li N., Yajnik V., Margolis B. A region in Shc distinct from the SH2 domain can bind tyrosine-phosphorylated growth factor receptors. J Biol Chem. 1994 Dec 23;269(51):32031–32034. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bork P., Margolis B. A phosphotyrosine interaction domain. Cell. 1995 Mar 10;80(5):693–694. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90347-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  5. Bork P., Sudol M. The WW domain: a signalling site in dystrophin? Trends Biochem Sci. 1994 Dec;19(12):531–533. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90053-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  6. Burkhardt A. L., Bolen J. B., Kieff E., Longnecker R. An Epstein-Barr virus transformation-associated membrane protein interacts with src family tyrosine kinases. J Virol. 1992 Aug;66(8):5161–5167. doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.8.5161-5167.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. Cicchetti P., Mayer B. J., Thiel G., Baltimore D. Identification of a protein that binds to the SH3 region of Abl and is similar to Bcr and GAP-rho. Science. 1992 Aug 7;257(5071):803–806. doi: 10.1126/science.1379745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  8. Cohen G. B., Ren R., Baltimore D. Modular binding domains in signal transduction proteins. Cell. 1995 Jan 27;80(2):237–248. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90406-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  9. Feller S. M., Knudsen B., Hanafusa H. c-Abl kinase regulates the protein binding activity of c-Crk. EMBO J. 1994 May 15;13(10):2341–2351. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06518.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. Flynn D. C., Leu T. H., Reynolds A. B., Parsons J. T. Identification and sequence analysis of cDNAs encoding a 110-kilodalton actin filament-associated pp60src substrate. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Dec;13(12):7892–7900. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.12.7892-7900.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. Foster D. A., Shibuya M., Hanafusa H. Activation of the transformation potential of the cellular fps gene. Cell. 1985 Aug;42(1):105–115. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80106-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  12. Fumagalli S., Totty N. F., Hsuan J. J., Courtneidge S. A. A target for Src in mitosis. Nature. 1994 Apr 28;368(6474):871–874. doi: 10.1038/368871a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  13. Haslam R. J., Koide H. B., Hemmings B. A. Pleckstrin domain homology. Nature. 1993 May 27;363(6427):309–310. doi: 10.1038/363309b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. Kaelin W. G., Jr, Krek W., Sellers W. R., DeCaprio J. A., Ajchenbaum F., Fuchs C. S., Chittenden T., Li Y., Farnham P. J., Blanar M. A. Expression cloning of a cDNA encoding a retinoblastoma-binding protein with E2F-like properties. Cell. 1992 Jul 24;70(2):351–364. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90108-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  15. Kavanaugh W. M., Williams L. T. An alternative to SH2 domains for binding tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins. Science. 1994 Dec 16;266(5192):1862–1865. doi: 10.1126/science.7527937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. Knudsen B. S., Zheng J., Feller S. M., Mayer J. P., Burrell S. K., Cowburn D., Hanafusa H. Affinity and specificity requirements for the first Src homology 3 domain of the Crk proteins. EMBO J. 1995 May 15;14(10):2191–2198. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07213.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. Koch C. A., Anderson D., Moran M. F., Ellis C., Pawson T. SH2 and SH3 domains: elements that control interactions of cytoplasmic signaling proteins. Science. 1991 May 3;252(5006):668–674. doi: 10.1126/science.1708916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  18. Li N., Batzer A., Daly R., Yajnik V., Skolnik E., Chardin P., Bar-Sagi D., Margolis B., Schlessinger J. Guanine-nucleotide-releasing factor hSos1 binds to Grb2 and links receptor tyrosine kinases to Ras signalling. Nature. 1993 May 6;363(6424):85–88. doi: 10.1038/363085a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. Longnecker R., Kieff E. A second Epstein-Barr virus membrane protein (LMP2) is expressed in latent infection and colocalizes with LMP1. J Virol. 1990 May;64(5):2319–2326. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.5.2319-2326.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  20. Mayer B. J., Baltimore D. Signalling through SH2 and SH3 domains. Trends Cell Biol. 1993 Jan;3(1):8–13. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(93)90194-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  21. Mayer B. J., Hamaguchi M., Hanafusa H. A novel viral oncogene with structural similarity to phospholipase C. Nature. 1988 Mar 17;332(6161):272–275. doi: 10.1038/332272a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  22. Mayer B. J., Hanafusa H. Mutagenic analysis of the v-crk oncogene: requirement for SH2 and SH3 domains and correlation between increased cellular phosphotyrosine and transformation. J Virol. 1990 Aug;64(8):3581–3589. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.8.3581-3589.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  23. Musacchio A., Wilmanns M., Saraste M. Structure and function of the SH3 domain. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1994;61(3):283–297. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(94)90003-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. Palazzolo M. J., Hamilton B. A., Ding D. L., Martin C. H., Mead D. A., Mierendorf R. C., Raghavan K. V., Meyerowitz E. M., Lipshitz H. D. Phage lambda cDNA cloning vectors for subtractive hybridization, fusion-protein synthesis and Cre-loxP automatic plasmid subcloning. Gene. 1990 Mar 30;88(1):25–36. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90056-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  25. Pawson T., Schlessingert J. SH2 and SH3 domains. Curr Biol. 1993 Jul 1;3(7):434–442. doi: 10.1016/0960-9822(93)90350-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  26. Reichman C. T., Mayer B. J., Keshav S., Hanafusa H. The product of the cellular crk gene consists primarily of SH2 and SH3 regions. Cell Growth Differ. 1992 Jul;3(7):451–460. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ren R., Mayer B. J., Cicchetti P., Baltimore D. Identification of a ten-amino acid proline-rich SH3 binding site. Science. 1993 Feb 19;259(5098):1157–1161. doi: 10.1126/science.8438166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  28. Rozakis-Adcock M., Fernley R., Wade J., Pawson T., Bowtell D. The SH2 and SH3 domains of mammalian Grb2 couple the EGF receptor to the Ras activator mSos1. Nature. 1993 May 6;363(6424):83–85. doi: 10.1038/363083a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  29. Saksela K., Cheng G., Baltimore D. Proline-rich (PxxP) motifs in HIV-1 Nef bind to SH3 domains of a subset of Src kinases and are required for the enhanced growth of Nef+ viruses but not for down-regulation of CD4. EMBO J. 1995 Feb 1;14(3):484–491. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07024.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  30. Sample J., Liebowitz D., Kieff E. Two related Epstein-Barr virus membrane proteins are encoded by separate genes. J Virol. 1989 Feb;63(2):933–937. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.2.933-937.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  31. Sanger F., Nicklen S., Coulson A. R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463–5467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  32. Smith D. B., Johnson K. S. Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions with glutathione S-transferase. Gene. 1988 Jul 15;67(1):31–40. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  33. Stahl M. L., Ferenz C. R., Kelleher K. L., Kriz R. W., Knopf J. L. Sequence similarity of phospholipase C with the non-catalytic region of src. Nature. 1988 Mar 17;332(6161):269–272. doi: 10.1038/332269a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  34. Sudol M., Bork P., Einbond A., Kastury K., Druck T., Negrini M., Huebner K., Lehman D. Characterization of the mammalian YAP (Yes-associated protein) gene and its role in defining a novel protein module, the WW domain. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jun 16;270(24):14733–14741. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.24.14733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  35. Sudol M. Yes-associated protein (YAP65) is a proline-rich phosphoprotein that binds to the SH3 domain of the Yes proto-oncogene product. Oncogene. 1994 Aug;9(8):2145–2152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Taylor S. J., Shalloway D. An RNA-binding protein associated with Src through its SH2 and SH3 domains in mitosis. Nature. 1994 Apr 28;368(6474):867–871. doi: 10.1038/368867a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  37. Wu X., Knudsen B., Feller S. M., Zheng J., Sali A., Cowburn D., Hanafusa H., Kuriyan J. Structural basis for the specific interaction of lysine-containing proline-rich peptides with the N-terminal SH3 domain of c-Crk. Structure. 1995 Feb 15;3(2):215–226. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(01)00151-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  38. Yu H., Chen J. K., Feng S., Dalgarno D. C., Brauer A. W., Schreiber S. L. Structural basis for the binding of proline-rich peptides to SH3 domains. Cell. 1994 Mar 11;76(5):933–945. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90367-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, H. I., & Sudol, M.
Affiliations
Rockefeller University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1995-08-15
Volume
92
Issue
17
Pages
7819-7823
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2033152875
Cited by
557
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k04ca001605-02)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA 01605)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (5T32GM07739-16, T32GM007739)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
WW domain, YAP, PY motif, protein-protein interaction, Src homology 3 domain, ligand identification
MeSH terms
YAP-Signaling Proteins, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Carrier Proteins, Cerebellum, Cloning, Molecular, Female, Glutathione Transferase, Humans, Lung, Molecular Sequence Data, Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Ovary, Phosphoproteins, Proline, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Transcription Factors, Restriction Mapping, Gene Library, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Open Reading Frames, Consensus Sequence, Conserved Sequence, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, DNA Primers, DNA, Complementary, Muscle, Skeletal, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review