The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cortical activity flips among quasi-stationary states.
Open accessAbstract
Parallel recordings of spike trains of several single cortical neurons in behaving monkeys were analyzed as a hidden Markov process. The parallel spike trains were considered as a multivariate Poisson process whose vector firing rates change with time. As a consequence of this approach, the complete recording can be segmented into a sequence of a few statistically discriminated hidden states, whose dynamics are modeled as a first-order Markov chain. The biological validity and benefits of this approach were examined in several independent ways: (i) the statistical consistency of the segmentation and its correspondence to the behavior of the animals; (ii) direct measurement of the collective flips of activity, obtained by the model; and (iii) the relation between the segmentation and the pair-wise short-term cross-correlations between the recorded spike trains. Comparison with surrogate data was also carried out for each of the above examinations to assure their significance. Our results indicated the existence of well-separated states of activity, within which the firing rates were approximately stationary. With our present data we could reliably discriminate six to eight such states. The transitions between states were fast and were associated with concomitant changes of firing rates of several neurons. Different behavioral modes and stimuli were consistently reflected by different states of neural activity. Moreover, the pair-wise correlations between neurons varied considerably between the different states, supporting the hypothesis that these distinct states were brought about by the cooperative action of many neurons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour
Duncan, J. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.004 · Cited by 1,846
Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings
Cunningham, J. P., & Yu, B. M. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3776 · Cited by 1,219
Tognoli, E., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.022 · Cited by 718
Analog Versus Digital: Extrapolating from Electronics to Neurobiology
Sarpeshkar, R. (1998) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976698300017052 · Cited by 496
The Structure of Cognition: Attentional Episodes in Mind and Brain
Duncan, J. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.015 · Cited by 471
Rapid Neocortical Dynamics: Cellular and Network Mechanisms
Haider, B., & McCormick, D. A. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.04.008 · Cited by 441
Integrated information in discrete dynamical systems: motivation and theoretical framework
Balduzzi, D., & Tononi, G. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000091 · Cited by 419
Functional, But Not Anatomical, Separation of “What” and “When” in Prefrontal Cortex
Machens, C. K., Romo, R., & Brody, C. D. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3276-09.2010 · Cited by 260
Variability in neuronal activity in primate cortex during working memory tasks
Shafi, M., Zhou, Y., Quintana, J., Chow, C., Fuster, J., & Bodner, M. (2007) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.12.072 · Cited by 215
Detecting Neural-State Transitions Using Hidden Markov Models for Motor Cortical Prostheses
Kemere, C., Santhanam, G., Yu, B. M., Afshar, A., Ryu, S. I., Meng, T. H., & Shenoy, K. V. (2008) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00924.2007 · Cited by 157
Book Review: Brain Function, Nonlinear Coupling, and Neuronal Transients
Friston, K. J. (2001) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/107385840100700510 · Cited by 141
Hierarchical coding for sequential task events in the monkey prefrontal cortex
Sigala, N., Kusunoki, M., Nimmo-Smith, I., Gaffan, D., & Duncan, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0802569105 · Cited by 140
Neural dynamics of choice: Single-trial analysis of decision-related activity in parietal cortex
Bollimunta, A., Totten, D., & Ditterich, J. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5752-11.2012 · Cited by 83
Metastable dynamics of neural circuits and networks
Brinkman, B. A. W., Yan, H., Maffei, A., Park, I. M., Fontanini, A., Wang, J., & La Camera, G. (2022) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/5.0062603 · Cited by 64
Lattice physics approaches for neural networks
Bardella, G., Franchini, S., Pani, P., & Ferraina, S. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.111390 · Cited by 17
Evidence of multistability in a realistic computer simulation of hippocampus subfield CA1
Siekmeier, P. J. (2009) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.01.021 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Abeles, M., Bergman, H., Gat, I., Meilijson, I., Seidemann, E., Tishby, N., & Vaadia, E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1995-09-12
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 8616-8620
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2027666633
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.