Cited by 83Neural dynamics and brain functionVisual perception and processing mechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Neural dynamics of choice: Single-trial analysis of decision-related activity in parietal cortex

Open access
Bollimunta, Anil, Totten, Douglas, Ditterich, Jochen·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Previous neurophysiological studies of perceptual decision-making have focused on single-unit activity, providing insufficient information about how individual decisions are accomplished. For the first time, we recorded simultaneously from multiple decision-related neurons in parietal cortex of monkeys performing a perceptual decision task and used these recordings to analyze the neural dynamics during single trials. We demonstrate that decision-related lateral intraparietal area neurons typically undergo gradual changes in firing rate during individual decisions, as predicted by mechanisms based on continuous integration of sensory evidence. Furthermore, we identify individual decisions that can be described as a change of mind: the decision circuitry was transiently in a state associated with a different choice before transitioning into a state associated with the final choice. These changes of mind reflected in monkey neural activity share similarities with previously reported changes of mind reflected in human behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5752-11.2012

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Streak index analysis showed randomness of local spike count fluctuations with close to zero mean (0.06 ± 1.36, mean ± SD).

    “streak index analysis (52) performed on a trial-by-trial basis (53) (SI Appendix, Fig. S10D, Materials and Methods), that showed randomness of local spike count fluctuations with close to zero mean (0.06 ± 1.36, mean ± SD, Fig. 4K)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gregory PC (2005) Bayesian logical data analysis for the physical sciences: a comparative approach with Mathematica support. Cambridge, UK: Cam- bridge UP.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bollimunta, A., Totten, D., & Ditterich, J.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-09-12
Volume
32
Issue
37
Pages
12684-12701
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2017410988
Cited by
83
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Air Force Research Laboratory (FA9550-07-1-0537, FA9550)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
perceptual decision making, parietal cortex, lateral intraparietal area, change of mind, choice
MeSH terms
Animals, Choice Behavior, Computer Simulation, Female, Macaca mulatta, Male, Models, Neurological, Motion Perception, Nerve Net, Parietal Lobe, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review