The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Retrotransposons of rice involved in mutations induced by tissue culture.
Open accessAbstract
Five retrotransposon families of rice (Tos1-Tos5) have been reported previously. Here we report 15 new retrotransposon families of rice (Tos6-Tos20). In contrast to yeast and Drosophila retrotransposons, all of the rice retrotransposons examined appear inactive (or almost inactive) under normal growth conditions. Three of the rice retrotransposons (Tos10, Tos17, and Tos19) are activated under tissue culture conditions. The most active one, Tos17, was studied in detail. The copy number of Tos17 increased with prolonged culture period. In all of the plants regenerated from tissue cultures, including transgenic plants, 5 to 30 transposed Tos17 copies were detected. The transcript of Tos17 was only detected under tissue culture conditions, indicating that the transposition of Tos17 is mainly regulated at the transcriptional level. To examine the target-site specificity of Tos17 transposition, sequences flanking transposed Tos17 copies were analyzed. At least four out of eight target sites examined are coding regions. Other target sites may also be in genes because two out of four were transcribed. The regenerated plants with Tos17-insertions in the phytochrome A gene and the S-receptor kinase-related gene were identified. These results indicate that activation of Tos17 is an important cause of tissue culture-induced mutations. Tissue culture-induced activation of Tos17 may be a useful tool for insertional mutagenesis and functional analysis of genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Transposable element contributions to plant gene and genome evolution
Bennetzen, J. L. (2000) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1006344508454 · Cited by 769
Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation in plants
Kaeppler, S. M., Kaeppler, H. F., & Rhee, Y. (2000) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1006423110134 · Cited by 743
Transposable Elements, Epigenetics, and Genome Evolution
Fedoroff, N. V. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.338.6108.758 · Cited by 634
Tanabe, S., Ashikari, M., Fujioka, S., Takatsuto, S., Yoshida, S., Yano, M., Yoshimura, A., Kitano, H., Matsuoka, M., Fujisawa, Y., et al. (2005) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.104.024950 · Cited by 555
To clone or not to clone plant QTLs: present and future challenges
Salvi, S., & Tuberosa, R. (2005) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2005.04.008 · Cited by 543
Metadata
- Authors
- Hirochika, H., Sugimoto, K., Otsuki, Y., Tsugawa, H., & Kanda, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1996-07-23
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 7783-7788
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2035644750
- Cited by
- 748
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retrotransposons of rice involved in mutations induced by tissue culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.93.15.7783
- The paper
- Hirochika, H., Sugimoto, K., Otsuki, Y., Tsugawa, H., & Kanda, M. (1996). Retrotransposons of rice involved in mutations induced by tissue culture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.15.7783
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.