Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A novel cationic lipid greatly enhances plasmid DNA delivery and expression in mouse lung.

Open access
Wheeler, C J, Felgner, P L, Tsai, Y J, Marshall, J, Sukhu, L, Doh, S G, Hartikka, J, Nietupski, J, Manthorpe, M, Nichols, M, Plewe, M, Liang, X, Norman, J, Smith, A, Cheng, S H·1996·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Effective gene therapy for lung tissue requires the use of efficient vehicles to deliver the gene of interest into lung cells. When plasmid DNA encoding chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) was administered intranasally to BALB/c mice without carrier lipids, CAT activity was detected in mouse lung extracts. Plasmid DNA delivered with optimally formulated commercially available transfection reagents expressed up to 10-fold more CAT activity in lung than observed with naked DNA alone. Liposome formulations consisting of (+/-)-N-(3-aminopropyl)-N,N-dimethyl-2,3-bis (dodecyloxy)-1-propanaminium bromide (GAP-DLRIE) plus the neutral colipid dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE) enhanced CAT expression by more than 100-fold relative to plasmid DNA alone. A single administration of GAP-DLRIE liposome-CAT DNA complexes to mouse lung elicited peak expression at days 1-4 posttransfection, followed by a gradual return to baseline by day 21 postadministration. Readministration of GAP-DLRIE liposome CAT complexes at day 21 led to another transient peak of reporter gene expression. Histological examination of lungs treated with GAP-DLRIE complexed beta-galactosidase DNA revealed that alveolar epithelial cells were the primary locus of expression and that up to 1% of all alveoli contained epithelial cells expressing the transgene.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11454

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 278

Metadata

Authors
Wheeler, C. J., Felgner, P. L., Tsai, Y. J., Marshall, J., Sukhu, L., Doh, S. G., Hartikka, J., Nietupski, J., Manthorpe, M., Nichols, M., Plewe, M., Liang, X., Norman, J., Smith, A., & Cheng, S. H.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1996-10-15
Volume
93
Issue
21
Pages
11454-11459
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2108192438
Cited by
278
References
36
FWCI
9.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A novel cationic lipid greatly enhances plasmid DNA delivery and expression in mouse lung. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.93.21.11454
The paper
Wheeler, C. J., Felgner, P. L., Tsai, Y. J., Marshall, J., Sukhu, L., Doh, S. G., Hartikka, J., Nietupski, J., Manthorpe, M., Nichols, M., Plewe, M., Liang, X., Norman, J., Smith, A., & Cheng, S. H. (1996). A novel cationic lipid greatly enhances plasmid DNA delivery and expression in mouse lung. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.21.11454

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.