Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Isolation of 10 differentially expressed cDNAs in p53-induced apoptosis: activation of the vertebrate homologue of the drosophila seven in absentia gene.

Open access
Amson, R B, Nemani, M, Roperch, J P, Israeli, D, Bougueleret, L, Le Gall, I, Medhioub, M, Linares-Cruz, G, Lethrosne, F, Pasturaud, P, Piouffre, L, Prieur, S, Susini, L, Alvaro, V, Millasseau, P, Guidicelli, C, Bui, H, Massart, C, Cazes, L, Dufour, F, Bruzzoni-Giovanelli, H, Owadi, H, Hennion, C, Charpak, G, Telerman, A·1996·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We report the isolation of 10 differentially expressed cDNAs in the process of apoptosis induced by the p53 tamor suppressor. As a global analytical method, we performed a differential display of mRNA between mouse M1 myeloid leukemia cells and derived clone LTR6 cells, which contain a stably transfected temperature-sensitive mutant of p53. At 32 degrees C wild-type p53 function is activated in LTR6 cells, resulting in programmed cell death. Eight genes are activated (TSAP; tumor suppressor activated pathway), and two are inhibited (TSIP, tumor suppressor inhibited pathway) in their expression. None of the 10 sequences has hitherto been recognized as part of the p53 signaling pathway. Three TSAPs are homologous to known genes. TSAP1 corresponds to phospholipase C beta 4. TSAP2 has a conserved domain homologous to a multiple endocrine neoplasia I (ZFM1) candidate gene. TSAP3 is the mouse homologue of the Drosophila seven in absentia gene. These data provide novel molecules involved in the pathway of wild-type p53 activation. They establish a functional link between a homologue of a conserved developmental Drosophila gene and signal transduction in tumor suppression leading to programmed cell death.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.93.9.3953

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Amson, R. B., Nemani, M., Roperch, J. P., Israeli, D., Bougueleret, L., Le Gall, I., Medhioub, M., Linares-Cruz, G., Lethrosne, F., Pasturaud, P., Piouffre, L., Prieur, S., Susini, L., Alvaro, V, Millasseau, P., Guidicelli, C., Bui, H., Massart, C., Cazes, L., Dufour, F., Bruzzoni-Giovanelli, H., Owadi, H., Hennion, C., Charpak, G., & Telerman, A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1996-04-30
Volume
93
Issue
9
Pages
3953-3957
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2085356240
Cited by
163
References
5
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isolation of 10 differentially expressed cDNAs in p53-induced apoptosis: activation of the vertebrate homologue of the drosophila seven in absentia gene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.93.9.3953
The paper
Amson, R. B., Nemani, M., Roperch, J. P., Israeli, D., Bougueleret, L., Le Gall, I., Medhioub, M., Linares-Cruz, G., Lethrosne, F., Pasturaud, P., Piouffre, L., Prieur, S., Susini, L., Alvaro, V, Millasseau, P., Guidicelli, C., Bui, H., Massart, C., Cazes, L., . . . Telerman, A. (1996). Isolation of 10 differentially expressed cDNAs in p53-induced apoptosis: activation of the vertebrate homologue of the drosophila seven in absentia gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.9.3953

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.