Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 448

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The origin and evolution of animal appendages

Open access
Panganiban, Grace, Irvine, Steven M., Lowe, Chris, Roehl, Henry, Corley, Laura S., Sherbon, Beverley, Grenier, Jennifer K., Fallon, John F., Kimble, Judith, Walker, Muriel, Wray, Gregory A., Swalla, Billie J., Martindale, Mark Q., Carroll, Sean B.·1997·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Animals have evolved diverse appendages adapted for locomotion, feeding and other functions. The genetics underlying appendage formation are best understood in insects and vertebrates. The expression of the Distal-less ( Dll ) homeoprotein during arthropod limb outgrowth and of Dll orthologs ( Dlx ) in fish fin and tetrapod limb buds led us to examine whether expression of this regulatory gene may be a general feature of appendage formation in protostomes and deuterostomes. We find that Dll is expressed along the proximodistal axis of developing polychaete annelid parapodia, onychophoran lobopodia, ascidian ampullae, and even echinoderm tube feet. Dll/Dlx expression in such diverse appendages in these six coelomate phyla could be convergent, but this would have required the independent co-option of Dll/Dlx several times in evolution. It appears more likely that ectodermal Dll/Dlx expression along proximodistal axes originated once in a common ancestor and has been used subsequently to pattern body wall outgrowths in a variety of organisms. We suggest that this pre-Cambrian ancestor of most protostomes and the deuterostomes possessed elements of the genetic machinery for and may have even borne appendages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5162

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1016/0012-1606(92)90047-K · doi:10.1016/0012-1606(92)90047-k
  2. J M Turbeville, D M Pfeifer, K G Field, R A Raff Mol Biol Evol 8, 669–686 (1991).
  3. 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1993.tb00216.x · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.1993.tb00216.x
  4. B Winnepenninckx, T Backeljau, L Y Mackey, J M Brooks, R D Wachter, S Kumar, J R Garey Mol Biol Evol 12, 1132–1137 (1995).
  5. K-E Lauterbach Zool Anat Jahrbuch 99, 64–92 (1978).
  6. 10.1002/aja.1001970305 · doi:10.1002/aja.1001970305

Cited by

See all 448

Metadata

Authors
Panganiban, G., Irvine, S. M., Lowe, C., Roehl, H., Corley, L. S., Sherbon, B., Grenier, J. K., Fallon, J. F., Kimble, J., Walker, M., Wray, G. A., Swalla, B. J., Martindale, M. Q., & Carroll, S. B.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1997-05-13
Volume
94
Issue
10
Pages
5162-5166
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2038945722
Cited by
448
References
53
FWCI
8.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The origin and evolution of animal appendages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.94.10.5162
The paper
Panganiban, G., Irvine, S. M., Lowe, C., Roehl, H., Corley, L. S., Sherbon, B., Grenier, J. K., Fallon, J. F., Kimble, J., Walker, M., Wray, G. A., Swalla, B. J., Martindale, M. Q., & Carroll, S. B. (1997). The origin and evolution of animal appendages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.10.5162

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.