Cited by 509Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchGeological and Geochemical Analysis

Isotopes, ice ages, and terminal Proterozoic earth history

Open access
Kaufman, Alan J., Knoll, Andrew H., Narbonne, Guy M.·1997·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Detailed correlations of ancient glacial deposits, based on temporal records of carbon and strontium isotopes in seawater, indicate four (and perhaps five) discrete ice ages in the terminal Proterozoic Eon. The close and repeated stratigraphic relationship between C-isotopic excursions and glaciogenic rocks suggests that unusually high rates of organic carbon burial facilitated glaciation by reducing atmospheric greenhouse capacity. The emerging framework of time and environmental change contributes to the improved resolution of stratigraphic and evolutionary pattern in the early fossil record of animals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.94.13.6600

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple major continental glaciations occurred between about 760 and 580 Mya, and at least one possibly involved sea-level glaciation at near-equatorial latitudes.

    “The latest Neoproterozoic is immediately preceded by multiple major continental glaciations that occurred between about 760 and 580 Mya (Kaufman et al., 1997).At least one and possibly more of these events involved glaciation at sea level at near-equatorial latitudes, a highly unusual occurrence.”

    From The last common bilaterian ancestor (2002) · cites this paper as Kaufman et al., 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaufman, A. J., Knoll, A. H., & Narbonne, G. M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1997-06-24
Volume
94
Issue
13
Pages
6600-6605
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2167166970
Cited by
509
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 19
FWCI
19.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
ice ages, carbon isotopes, strontium isotopes, seawater isotopes, glacial deposits, organic carbon burial, glaciation, Precambrian stratigraphy
MeSH terms
Animals, Australia, Canada, Carbon Isotopes, Cold Climate, Fossils, Geology, Ice, Namibia, Paleontology, Seawater, Strontium Isotopes, Svalbard, Earth, Planet, Geologic Sediments, Evolution, Planetary, Geological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review