Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Purification and molecular cloning of a secreted, Frizzled-related antagonist of Wnt action

Open access
Finch, Paul W., He, Xi, Kelley, Michael J., Üren, Aykut, Schaudies, R. Paul, Popescu, Nicholas C., Rudikoff, Stuart, Aaronson, Stuart A., Varmus, Harold E., Rubin, Jeffrey S.·1997·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Frizzled polypeptides are integral membrane proteins that recently were shown to function as receptors for Wnt signaling molecules. Here, we report the identification of a novel, secreted 36-kDa protein that contains a region homologous to a putative Wnt-binding domain of Frizzleds. This protein, called Frizzled-related protein (FRP), was first identified as a heparin-binding polypeptide that copurified with hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor in conditioned medium from a human embryonic lung fibroblast line. Degenerate oligonucleotides, based on the NH 2 -terminal sequence of the purified protein, were used to isolate corresponding cDNA clones. These encoded a 313-amino acid polypeptide, containing a cysteine-rich domain of ≈110 residues that was 30–40% identical to the putative ligand-binding domain of Frizzled proteins. A 4.4-kb transcript of the FRP gene is present in many organs, both in the adult and during embryogenesis, and homologs of the gene are detectable in DNA from several vertebrate species. In biosynthetic studies, FRP was secreted but, like Wnts, tended to remain associated with cells. When coexpressed with several Wnt family members in early Xenopus embryos, FRP antagonized Wnt-dependent duplication of the embryonic dorsal axis. These results indicate that FRP may function as an inhibitor of Wnt action during development and in the adult.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.94.13.6770

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 417

Metadata

Authors
Finch, P. W., He, X., Kelley, M. J., Üren, A., Schaudies, R. P., Popescu, N. C., Rudikoff, S., Aaronson, S. A., Varmus, H. E., & Rubin, J. S.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1997-06-24
Volume
94
Issue
13
Pages
6770-6775
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2127280898
Cited by
417
References
2
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Purification and molecular cloning of a secreted, Frizzled-related antagonist of Wnt action. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.94.13.6770
The paper
Finch, P. W., He, X., Kelley, M. J., Üren, A., Schaudies, R. P., Popescu, N. C., Rudikoff, S., Aaronson, S. A., Varmus, H. E., & Rubin, J. S. (1997). Purification and molecular cloning of a secreted, Frizzled-related antagonist of Wnt action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.13.6770

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.