The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effective intercellular communication distances are determined by the relative time constants for cyto/chemokine secretion and diffusion
Open accessAbstract
A cell’s ability to effectively communicate with a neighboring cell is essential for tissue function and ultimately for the organism to which it belongs. One important mode of intercellular communication is the release of soluble cyto- and chemokines. Once secreted, these signaling molecules diffuse through the surrounding medium and eventually bind to neighboring cell’s receptors whereby the signal is received. This mode of communication is governed both by physicochemical transport processes and cellular secretion rates, which in turn are determined by genetic and biochemical processes. The characteristics of transport processes have been known for some time, and information on the genetic and biochemical determinants of cellular function is rapidly growing. Simultaneous quantitative analysis of the two is required to systematically evaluate the nature and limitations of intercellular signaling. The present study uses a solitary cell model to estimate effective communication distances over which a single cell can meaningfully propagate a soluble signal. The analysis reveals that: (i) this process is governed by a single, key, dimensionless group that is a ratio of biological parameters and physicochemical determinants; (ii) this ratio has a maximal value; (iii) for realistic values of the parameters contained in this dimensionless group, it is estimated that the domain that a single cell can effectively communicate in is ≈250 μm in size; and (iv) the communication within this domain takes place in 10–30 minutes. These results have fundamental implications for interpretation of organ physiology and for engineering tissue function ex vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cell Migration: A Physically Integrated Molecular Process
Lauffenburger, D. A., & Horwitz, A. F. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81280-5 · Cited by 3,915
A minimal gene set for cellular life derived by comparison of complete bacterial genomes
Mushegian, A. R., & Koonin, E. V. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.19.10268 · Cited by 916
Cited by
Deciphering cell–cell interactions and communication from gene expression
Armingol, E., Officer, A., Harismendy, O., & Lewis, N. E. (2021) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-00292-x · Cited by 1,267
Tumour-infiltrating Gr-1+ myeloid cells antagonize senescence in cancer
Di Mitri, D., Toso, A., Chen, J. J., Sarti, M., Pinton, S., Jost, T. R., D’Antuono, R., Montani, E., Garcia-Escudero, R., Guccini, I., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13638 · Cited by 388
Computational approaches and challenges in spatial transcriptomics
Fang, S., Chen, B., Zhang, Y., Sun, H., Liu, L., Liu, S., Li, Y., & Xu, X. (2023) · Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2022.10.001 · Cited by 159
A stochastic view of lymphocyte motility and trafficking within the lymph node
Wei, S. H., Parker, I., Miller, M. J., & Cahalan, M. D. (2003) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1034/j.1600-065x.2003.00076.x · Cited by 117
Skousen, J. L., Bridge, M. J., & Tresco, P. A. (2015) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.039 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Francis, K., & Palsson, B. O.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1997-11-11
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 12258-12262
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2086335524
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.