Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cytosine methylation determines hot spots of DNA damage in the human P 53 gene

Open access
Denissenko, Mikhail F., Chen, James X., Tang, Moon-shong, Pfeifer, Gerd P.·1997·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

In the P53 tumor suppressor gene, a remarkably large number of somatic mutations are found at methylated CpG dinucleotides. We have previously mapped the distribution of (±) anti -7β,8α-dihydroxy-9α,10α-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[ a ]pyrene (BPDE) adducts along the human P53 gene [Denissenko, M. F., Pao, A., Tang, M.-s. & Pfeifer, G. P. (1996) Science 274, 430–432]. Strong and selective formation of adducts occurred at guanines in CpG sequences of codons 157, 248, and 273, which are the major mutational hot spots in lung cancer. Chromatin structure was not involved in preferential modification of these sites by BPDE. To investigate other possible mechanisms underlying the selectivity of BPDE binding, we have mapped the adducts in plasmid DNA containing genomic P53 sequences. The adduct profile obtained was different from that in genomic DNA. However, when cytosines at CpG sequences were converted to 5-methylcytosines by the CpG-specific methylase Sss I and the DNA was subsequently treated with BPDE, adduct hot spots were created which were similar to those seen in genomic DNA where all CpGs are methylated. A strong positive effect of 5-methylcytosine on BPDE adduct formation at CpG sites was also documented with sequences of the PGK1 gene derived from an active or inactive human X chromosome and having differential methylation patterns. These results show that methylated CpG dinucleotides, in addition to being an endogenous promutagenic factor, may represent a preferential target for exogenous chemical carcinogens. The data open new avenues concerning the reasons that the majority of mutational hot spots in human genes are at CpGs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3893

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Metadata

Authors
Denissenko, M. F., Chen, J. X., Tang, M.-S., & Pfeifer, G. P.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1997-04-15
Volume
94
Issue
8
Pages
3893-3898
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2138100316
Cited by
339
References
43
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cytosine methylation determines hot spots of DNA damage in the human P 53 gene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.94.8.3893
The paper
Denissenko, M. F., Chen, J. X., Tang, M.-S., & Pfeifer, G. P. (1997). Cytosine methylation determines hot spots of DNA damage in the human P 53 gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.8.3893

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.