Cited by 86Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Expression profiles of multiple genes in single neurons of Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Chow, Nienwen, Cox, Chris, Callahan, Linda M., Weimer, Jill M., Guo, LiRong, Coleman, Paul D.·1998·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Many changes have been described in the brains of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients, including loss of neurons and formation of senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. The molecular mechanisms underlying these pathologies are unclear. Northern blot, dot-blot, and reverse transcription-coupled PCR analyses have demonstrated altered expression levels of multiple messages in AD brain. Because not all cells are equally affected by the disease, these methods obviously cannot study the changes in relation to disease states of individual cells. We address this problem by using antisense RNA profiling of single cells. We present expression profiles of single neurons at early and late stages of AD and describe statistical tools for data analysis. With multivariate canonical analysis, we were able to distinguish the disease state on the basis of altered expression of multiple messages. To validate this approach, we compared results obtained by this approach with results obtained by in situ hybridization analysis. When the neurofilament medium subunit was used as a marker, our results from an antisense RNA profiling revealed no change in neurofilament medium subunit expression between early- and late-stage AD, consistent with findings obtained with in situ hybridization. However, our results obtained by either analysis at the single-cell level differed from the reported decrease in AD neocortex obtained by Northern blot analysis [Kittur, S., Hoh, J., Endo, H., Tourtellotte, W., Weeks, B. S., Markesbery, W. & Adler, W. (1994) J. Geriatr. Psychiatry Neurol. 7, 153–158]. Thus, the strategy of using the single-cell antisense RNA approach to identify altered gene expression in postmortem AD brain, followed by detailed in situ hybridization studies for genes of interest, is valuable in the study of the molecular mechanisms underlying AD neuropathology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9620

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reduced dendritic spine density in Tg2576 mice is consistent with findings in AD and mouse models of AD that showed decreases in mRNA for multiple synaptic genes.

    “The reduced dendritic spine density in Tg2576 mice is also consistent with findings in AD and mouse models of AD that showed decreases in mRNA for multiple synaptic genes (Chow et al., 1998;Coleman and Yao, 2003;Dickey et al., 2003).”

    From Dendritic Spine Abnormalities in Amyloid Precursor Protein Transgenic Mice Demonstrated by Gene Transfer and Intravital Multiphoton Microscopy (2005) · cites this paper as Chow et al., 1998

    The Results report decreased RNA for several genes in late-stage human AD neurons, including GAD. But the other reported decreases are for cyclin D1 and HSP27, not multiple synaptic genes. This paper does not study mouse models; the other citations may address that part of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. [1]Glenner G G, Wong C W. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984;120:885–90. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(84)80190-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Forloni G. Curr Opin Neurol. 1996;9:492–500. doi: 10.1097/00019052-199612000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  3. [3]Grundke-Iqbal I, Iqbal K, Tung Y C, Quinlan M, Wisniewski H M, Binder L I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:4913–4917. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.13.4913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Goedert M, Spillantini M G, Cairns N J, Crowther R A. Neuron. 1992;8:159–168. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90117-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  5. [5]Callahan L, Coleman P D. Neurobiol Aging. 1995;16:311–314. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(95)00035-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  6. [6]Callahan L M, Selski D J, Martzen M R, Cheetham J E, Coleman P D. Neurobiol Aging. 1994;15:381–386. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(94)90041-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. [7]Eberwine J, Yeh H, Miyashiro K, Cao Y, Nair S, Finnell R, Zettel M, Coleman P. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:3010–3014. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.7.3010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  8. [8]Cheetham J E, Coleman P D, Chow N. J Neurosci Methods. 1997;77:43–48. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0270(97)00109-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  9. [9]Crino P B, Trojanowski J Q, Dichter M A, Eberwine J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:14152–14157. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.14152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. [10]Wlodarczyk B, Bennett G D, Calvin J A, Craig J C, Finnell R H. Dev Genet. 1996;18:306–315. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1996)18:4<306::AID-DVG4>3.0.CO;2-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. [11]Craig J C, Eberwine J H, Calvin J A, Wlodarczyk B, Bennett G D, Finnell R H. Biochem Mol Med. 1997;60:81–91. doi: 10.1006/bmme.1997.2576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  12. [12]Ghasemzadeh M B, Sharma S, Surmeier D J, Eberwine J H, Chesselet M-F. Mol Pharmacol. 1996;49:852–859. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. [13]Crino P B, Eberwine J. Neuron. 1996;17:1173–1187. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80248-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. [15]Kshirsager A M. Multivariate Analysis. New York: Dekker; 1972. [Google Scholar]
  15. [16]Myers M W, Lazzarini R A, Lee V M, Schlaepfer W W, Nelson D L. EMBO J. 1987;6:1617–1626. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02409.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. [17]Angerer L M, Angerer R C. Methods Cell Biol. 1991;35:37–71. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60568-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. [18]Lockhart D J, Dong H, Byrne M C, Follettie M T, Gallo M V, Chee M S, Mittmann M, Wang C, Kobayashi M, Horton H, Brown E L. Nat Biotechnol. 1996;14:1675–1680. doi: 10.1038/nbt1296-1675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  18. [19]Freeman R S, Estus S, Johnson E M., Jr Neuron. 1994;12:343–355. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90276-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. [20]Kranenburg O, van der Eb A J, Zantema A. EMBO J. 1996;15:46–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. [21]Vincent I, Jicha G, Rosado M, Dickson Q W. J Neurosci. 1997;17:3588–3598. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-10-03588.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  21. [22]Mehlen P, Schulze-Osthoff K, Arrigo A-P. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:16510–16514. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.28.16510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  22. [23]Huot J, Houle F, Spitz D R, Landry J. Cancer Res. 1996;56:273–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. [24]Rogers J, Webster S, Lue L-F, Brachova L, Civin W H, Emmerling M, Shivers B, Walker D, McGeer P. Neurobiol Aging. 1996;17:681–686. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(96)00115-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. [25]Lukiw W J, Wong L, McLachlan D R. Int J Neurosci. 1990;55:81–88. doi: 10.3109/00207459008985953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  25. [26]Robinson C A, Clark A W, Parhad I M, Fung T S, Bou S S. Neurobiol Aging. 1994;15:681–690. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(94)90049-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  26. [27]Kittur S, Hoh J, Endo H, Tourtellotte W, Weeks B S, Markesbery W, Adler W. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1994;7:153–158. doi: 10.1177/089198879400700305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  27. [28]Velculescu V E, Zhang L, Vogelstein B, Kinzler K W. Science. 1995;270:484–487. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5235.484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  28. [29]Schena M, Shalon Q, Davis R W, Brown P O. Science. 1995;270:467–470. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5235.467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  29. [30]Zhang L, Zhou W, Velculescu V E, Kern S E, Hruban R H, Hamilton S R, Vogelstein B, Kinzler K W. Science. 1997;276:1268–1272. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5316.1268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  30. [31]DeRisi J, Penland L, Brown P O, Bittner M L, Meltzer P S, Ray M, Chen Y, Su Y A, Trant J M. Nat Genet. 1996;14:457–460. doi: 10.1038/ng1296-457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chow, N., Cox, C., Callahan, L. M., Weimer, J. M., Guo, L., & Coleman, P. D.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1998-08-04
Volume
95
Issue
16
Pages
9620-9625
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2084727872
Cited by
86
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Health Assistance Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5r35ag009016-07, 5r01ag014441-05)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 08665, AG09016, R01 AG14441, P30AG008665)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, single-cell gene expression profiling, single neurons, disease stage, postmortem brain, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, neocortex
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Base Sequence, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Neurons, Oligonucleotide Probes, RNA, Antisense, In Situ Hybridization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review