The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Replicational and transcriptional selection on codon usage in Borrelia burgdorferi
Open accessAbstract
With more than 10 fully sequenced, publicly available prokaryotic genomes, it is now becoming possible to gain useful insights into genome evolution. Before the genome era, many evolutionary processes were evaluated from limited data sets and evolutionary models were constructed on the basis of small amounts of evidence. In this paper, I show that genes on the Borrelia burgdorferi genome have two separate, distinct, and significantly different codon usages, depending on whether the gene is transcribed on the leading or lagging strand of replication. Asymmetrical replication is the major source of codon usage variation. Replicational selection is responsible for the higher number of genes on the leading strands, and transcriptional selection appears to be responsible for the enrichment of highly expressed genes on these strands. Replicational–transcriptional selection, therefore, has an influence on the codon usage of a gene. This is a new paradigm of codon selection in prokaryotes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer-Directed Enzymatic Amplification of DNA with a Thermostable DNA Polymerase
Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S. J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B., & Erlich, H. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2448875 · Cited by 17,719
Progression of the cell cycle through mitosis leads to abortion of nascent transcripts
Shermoen, A. W., & O'Farrell, P. H. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90182-x · Cited by 360
Cited by
Variation in the strength of selected codon usage bias among bacteria
Sharp, P. M. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki242 · Cited by 429
Why prokaryotes have pangenomes
McInerney, J. O., McNally, A., & O'Connell, M. J. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.40 · Cited by 420
Self-citationKanaya, S., Yamada, Y., Kudo, Y., & Ikemura, T. (1999) · Gene · doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00225-5 · Cited by 417
Asymmetric substitution patterns: a review of possible underlying mutational or selective mechanisms
Frank, A. C., & Lobry, J. R. (1999) · Gene · doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00297-8 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- McInerney, J. O.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 10698-10703
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2154278477
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Replicational and transcriptional selection on codon usage in Borrelia burgdorferi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.18.10698
- The paper
- McInerney, J. O. (1998). Replicational and transcriptional selection on codon usage in Borrelia burgdorferi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.18.10698
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.