The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DNA sequence-dependent deformability deduced from protein–DNA crystal complexes
Open accessAbstract
The deformability of double helical DNA is critical for its packaging in the cell, recognition by other molecules, and transient opening during biochemically important processes. Here, a complete set of sequence-dependent empirical energy functions suitable for describing such behavior is extracted from the fluctuations and correlations of structural parameters in DNA–protein crystal complexes. These elastic functions provide useful stereochemical measures of the local base step movements operative in sequence-specific recognition and protein-induced deformations. In particular, the pyrimidine-purine dimers stand out as the most variable steps in the DNA–protein complexes, apparently acting as flexible “hinges” fitting the duplex to the protein surface. In addition to the angular parameters widely used to describe DNA deformations (i.e., the bend and twist angles), the translational parameters describing the displacements of base pairs along and across the helical axis are analyzed. The observed correlations of base pair bending and shearing motions are important for nonplanar folding of DNA in nucleosomes and other nucleoprotein complexes. The knowledge-based energies also offer realistic three-dimensional models for the study of long DNA polymers at the global level, incorporating structural features beyond the scope of conventional elastic rod treatments and adding a new dimension to literal analyses of genomic sequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Transcriptional control of human p53-regulated genes
Riley, T., Sontag, E., Chen, P., & Levine, A. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2395 · Cited by 1,921
Absence of a simple code: how transcription factors read the genome
Slattery, M., Zhou, T., Yang, L., Dantas Machado, A. C., Gordân, R., & Rohs, R. (2014) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2014.07.002 · Cited by 537
Nucleosome structure and function
McGinty, R. K., & Tan, S. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500373h · Cited by 530
Role of DNA sequence in nucleosome stability and dynamics
Widom, J. (2001) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583501003699 · Cited by 364
DNA Binding Cooperativity of p53 Modulates the Decision between Cell-Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis
Schlereth, K., Beinoraviciute-Kellner, R., Zeitlinger, M. K., Bretz, A. C., Sauer, M., Charles, J. P., Vogiatzi, F., Leich, E., Samans, B., Eilers, M., et al. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.037 · Cited by 113
An overview of the prediction of protein DNA-binding sites
Si, J., Zhao, R., & Wu, R. (2015) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms16035194 · Cited by 91
Control of DNA minor groove width and Fis protein binding by the purine 2-amino group
Hancock, S. P., Ghane, T., Cascio, D., Rohs, R., Di Felice, R., & Johnson, R. C. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt357 · Cited by 83
Kalodimos, C. G., Boelens, R., & Kaptein, R. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0304065 · Cited by 79
Key determinants of target DNA recognition by retroviral intasomes
Serrao, E., Ballandras-Colas, A., Cherepanov, P., Maertens, G. N., & Engelman, A. N. (2015) · Retrovirology · doi:10.1186/s12977-015-0167-3 · Cited by 62
Shi, X., Herschlag, D., & Harbury, P. A. B. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1218830110 · Cited by 41
Interfacial water confers transcription factors with dinucleotide specificity
(2025) · doi:10.1038/s41594-024-01449-6 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Olson, W. K., Gorin, A. A., Lu, X.-J., Hock, L. M., & Zhurkin, V. B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-09-15
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 11163-11168
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2095994064
- Cited by
- 1,038
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.