Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 724

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Charge transfer and transport in DNA

Open access
Jortner, Joshua, Bixon, Mordechai, Langenbacher, Thomas, Michel-Beyerle, Maria E.·1998·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We explore charge migration in DNA, advancing two distinct mechanisms of charge separation in a donor (d)–bridge ({B j})–acceptor (a) system, where {B j} = B 1,B 2, … , B N are the N-specific adjacent bases of B-DNA: (i) two-center unistep superexchange induced charge transfer, d*{B j}a → d∓{B j}a±, and (ii) multistep charge transport involves charge injection from d* (or d+) to {B j}, charge hopping within {B j}, and charge trapping by a. For off-resonance coupling, mechanism i prevails with the charge separation rate and yield exhibiting an exponential dependence ∝ exp(−βR) on the d-a distance (R). Resonance coupling results in mechanism ii with the charge separation lifetime τ ∝ N η and yield Y ≃ (1 + δ̄ N η)−1 exhibiting a weak (algebraic) N and distance dependence. The power parameter η is determined by charge hopping random walk. Energetic control of the charge migration mechanism is exerted by the energetics of the ion pair state d∓B 1±B 2 … B N a relative to the electronically excited donor doorway state d*B 1 B 2 … B N a. The realization of charge separation via superexchange or hopping is determined by the base sequence within the bridge. Our energetic–dynamic relations, in conjunction with the energetic data for d*/d−and for B/B+, determine the realization of the two distinct mechanisms in different hole donor systems, establishing the conditions for “chemistry at a distance” after charge transport in DNA. The energetic control of the charge migration mechanisms attained by the sequence specificity of the bridge is universal for large molecular-scale systems, for proteins, and for DNA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.95.22.12759

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 724

Metadata

Authors
Jortner, J., Bixon, M., Langenbacher, T., & Michel-Beyerle, M. E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1998-10-27
Volume
95
Issue
22
Pages
12759-12765
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2058878291
Cited by
724
References
3
FWCI
32.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Charge transfer and transport in DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.22.12759
The paper
Jortner, J., Bixon, M., Langenbacher, T., & Michel-Beyerle, M. E. (1998). Charge transfer and transport in DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.22.12759

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.