The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Charge transfer and transport in DNA
Open accessAbstract
We explore charge migration in DNA, advancing two distinct mechanisms of charge separation in a donor (d)–bridge ({B j})–acceptor (a) system, where {B j} = B 1,B 2, … , B N are the N-specific adjacent bases of B-DNA: (i) two-center unistep superexchange induced charge transfer, d*{B j}a → d∓{B j}a±, and (ii) multistep charge transport involves charge injection from d* (or d+) to {B j}, charge hopping within {B j}, and charge trapping by a. For off-resonance coupling, mechanism i prevails with the charge separation rate and yield exhibiting an exponential dependence ∝ exp(−βR) on the d-a distance (R). Resonance coupling results in mechanism ii with the charge separation lifetime τ ∝ N η and yield Y ≃ (1 + δ̄ N η)−1 exhibiting a weak (algebraic) N and distance dependence. The power parameter η is determined by charge hopping random walk. Energetic control of the charge migration mechanism is exerted by the energetics of the ion pair state d∓B 1±B 2 … B N a relative to the electronically excited donor doorway state d*B 1 B 2 … B N a. The realization of charge separation via superexchange or hopping is determined by the base sequence within the bridge. Our energetic–dynamic relations, in conjunction with the energetic data for d*/d−and for B/B+, determine the realization of the two distinct mechanisms in different hole donor systems, establishing the conditions for “chemistry at a distance” after charge transport in DNA. The energetic control of the charge migration mechanisms attained by the sequence specificity of the bridge is universal for large molecular-scale systems, for proteins, and for DNA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Steenken, S., & Jovanovic, S. V. (1997) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja962255b · Cited by 1,450
Oxidative DNA damage through long-range electron transfer
Hall, D. B., Holmlin, R. E., & Barton, J. K. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/382731a0 · Cited by 825
Photoenzymic repair of UV-damaged DNA: a chemist's perspective
Heelis, P. F., Hartman, R. F., & Rose, S. D. (1995) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/cs9952400289 · Cited by 162
Cited by
Stubbe, J., Nocera, D. G., Yee, C. S., & Chang, M. C. Y. (2003) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020421u · Cited by 823
Mechanisms for DNA Charge Transport
Genereux, J. C., & Barton, J. K. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900228f · Cited by 787
Long-Range Charge Transfer in DNA: Transient Structural Distortions Control the Distance Dependence
Schuster, G. B. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar980059z · Cited by 778
Proximity-Induced Superconductivity in DNA
Kasumov, A. Y., Kociak, M., Guéron, S., Reulet, B., Volkov, V. T., Klinov, D. V., & Bouchiat, H. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5502.280 · Cited by 710
Charge Migration in DNA: Ion-Gated Transport
Barnett, R. N., Cleveland, C. L., Joy, A., Landman, U., & Schuster, G. B. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062864 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Jortner, J., Bixon, M., Langenbacher, T., & Michel-Beyerle, M. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-10-27
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 12759-12765
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2058878291
- Cited by
- 724
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 32.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Charge transfer and transport in DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.22.12759
- The paper
- Jortner, J., Bixon, M., Langenbacher, T., & Michel-Beyerle, M. E. (1998). Charge transfer and transport in DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.22.12759
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.