The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complete mitochondrial genome suggests diapsid affinities of turtles
Open accessAbstract
Despite more than a century of debate, the evolutionary position of turtles (Testudines) relative to other amniotes (reptiles, birds, and mammals) remains uncertain. One of the major impediments to resolving this important evolutionary problem is the highly distinctive and enigmatic morphology of turtles that led to their traditional placement apart from diapsid reptiles as sole descendants of presumably primitive anapsid reptiles. To address this question, the complete (16,787-bp) mitochondrial genome sequence of the African side-necked turtle ( Pelomedusa subrufa ) was determined. This molecule contains several unusual features: a (TA) n microsatellite in the control region, the absence of an origin of replication for the light strand in the WANCY region of five tRNA genes, an unusually long noncoding region separating the ND5 and ND6 genes, an overlap between ATPase 6 and COIII genes, and the existence of extra nucleotides in ND3 and ND4L putative ORFs. Phylogenetic analyses of the complete mitochondrial genome sequences supported the placement of turtles as the sister group of an alligator and chicken (Archosauria) clade. This result clearly rejects the Haematothermia hypothesis (a sister-group relationship between mammals and birds), as well as rejecting the placement of turtles as the most basal living amniotes. Moreover, evidence from both complete mitochondrial rRNA genes supports a sister-group relationship of turtles to Archosauria to the exclusion of Lepidosauria (tuatara, snakes, and lizards). These results challenge the classic view of turtles as the only survivors of primary anapsid reptiles and imply that turtles might have secondarily lost their skull fenestration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dating of the human–ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.
Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., & Yano, T.-A. (1985) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02101694 · Cited by 8,687
Quartet Puzzling: A Quartet Maximum-Likelihood Method for Reconstructing Tree Topologies
Strimmer, K., & von Haeseler, A. (1996) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025664 · Cited by 2,531
(1990) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040628 · Cited by 198
Cited by
FROST, D. R., GRANT, T., FAIVOVICH, J., BAIN, R. H., HAAS, A., HADDAD, C. F. B., DE SÁ, R. O., CHANNING, A., WILKINSON, M., DONNELLAN, S. C., et al. (2006) · Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History · doi:10.1206/0003-0090(2006)297[0001:tatol]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,922
Best Practices for Justifying Fossil Calibrations
Parham, J. F., Donoghue, P. C. J., Bell, C. J., Calway, T. D., Head, J. J., Holroyd, P. A., Inoue, J. G., Irmis, R. B., Joyce, W. G., Ksepka, D. T., et al. (2012) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syr107 · Cited by 780
Broughton, R. E., Milam, J. E., & Roe, B. A. (2001) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.156801 · Cited by 377
Crawford, N. G., Faircloth, B. C., McCormack, J. E., Brumfield, R. T., Winker, K., & Glenn, T. C. (2012) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0331 · Cited by 357
Chiari, Y., Cahais, V., Galtier, N., & Delsuc, F. (2012) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-10-65 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Zardoya, R., & Meyer, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-11-24
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 14226-14231
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2085638614
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complete mitochondrial genome suggests diapsid affinities of turtles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.24.14226
- The paper
- Zardoya, R., & Meyer, A. (1998). Complete mitochondrial genome suggests diapsid affinities of turtles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.24.14226
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.