The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Amyloid fibril formation by an SH3 domain
Open accessAbstract
The SH3 domain is a well characterized small protein module with a simple fold found in many proteins. At acid pH, the SH3 domain (PI3-SH3) of the p85α subunit of bovine phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase slowly forms a gel that consists of typical amyloid fibrils as assessed by electron microscopy, a Congo red binding assay, and x-ray fiber diffraction. The soluble form of PI3-SH3 at acid pH (the A state by a variety of techniques) from which fibrils are generated has been characterized. Circular dichroism in the far- and near-UV regions and 1 H NMR indicate that the A state is substantially unfolded relative to the native protein at neutral pH. NMR diffusion measurements indicate, however, that the effective hydrodynamic radius of the A state is only 23% higher than that of the native protein and is 20% lower than that of the protein denatured in 3.5 M guanidinium chloride. In addition, the A state binds the hydrophobic dye 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonic acid, which suggests that SH3 in this state has a partially formed hydrophobic core. These results indicate that the A state is partially folded and support the hypothesis that partially folded states formed in solution are precursors of amyloid deposition. Moreover, that this domain aggregates into amyloid fibrils suggests that the potential for amyloid deposition may be a common property of proteins, and not only of a few proteins associated with disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Protein Misfolding, Amyloid Formation, and Human Disease: A Summary of Progress Over the Last Decade
Chiti, F., & Dobson, C. M. (2017) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-045115 · Cited by 2,629
Self-citationInherent toxicity of aggregates implies a common mechanism for protein misfolding diseases
Bucciantini, M., Giannoni, E., Chiti, F., Baroni, F., Formigli, L., Zurdo, J., Taddei, N., Ramponi, G., Dobson, C. M., & Stefani, M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416507a · Cited by 2,434
Self-citationThe amyloid state and its association with protein misfolding diseases.
Knowles, T. P. J., Vendruscolo, M., & Dobson, C. M. (2014) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3810 · Cited by 2,382
Self-citationProtein misfolding in neurodegenerative diseases: Implications and strategies
Sweeney, P., Park, H., Baumann, M., Dunlop, J., Frydman, J., Kopito, R., McCampbell, A., Leblanc, G., Venkateswaran, A., Nurmi, A., et al. (2017) · Translational Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s40035-017-0077-5 · Cited by 675
The expanding amyloid family: Structure, stability, function, and pathogenesis
Sawaya, M. R., Hughes, M. P., Rodriguez, J. A., Riek, R., & Eisenberg, D. S. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.08.013 · Cited by 475
Structural basis for SH3 domain‐mediated high‐affinity binding between Mona/Gads and SLP‐76
Harkiolaki, M., Lewitzky, M., Gilbert, R. J. C., Jones, E., Bourette, R. P., Mouchiroud, G., Sondermann, H., Moarefi, I., & Feller, S. M. (2003) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg258 · Cited by 102
Tau and TDP-43 proteinopathies: kindred pathologic cascades and genetic pleiotropy
Chornenkyy, Y., Fardo, D. W., & Nelson, P. T. (2019) · Laboratory Investigation · doi:10.1038/s41374-019-0196-y · Cited by 93
Chow, W. Y., De Paëpe, G., & Hediger, S. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c01043 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Guijarro, J. I., Sunde, M., Jones, J. A., Campbell, I. D., & Dobson, C. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-04-14
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4224-4228
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2055378374
- Cited by
- 669
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.