Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative analysis of hepatitis C virus-specific CD8+T cells in peripheral blood and liver using peptide-MHC tetramers

Open access
He, Xiao-Song, Rehermann, Barbara, López-Labrador, F. Xavier, Boisvert, Judie, Cheung, Ramsey, Mumm, John, Wedemeyer, Heiner, Berenguer, Marina, Wright, Teresa L., Davis, Mark M., Greenberg, Harry B.·1999·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

It is believed that the hepatitis C virus (HCV)-specific CD8+cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) play a role in the development of liver cell injury and in the clearance of the virus. To develop a direct binding assay for HCV-specific CTLs, we generated two peptide-MHC tetramers by using the recombinant HLA A2.1 molecule and A2-restricted T cell epitopes of the HCV NS3 protein. With these reagents we are able to detect specific CD8+cells in the blood of 15 of 20 HLA-A2+, HCV-infected patients, at a frequency ranging from 0.01% to 1.2% of peripheral CD8+T cells. Phenotypic analysis of these specific cells indicated that there is a significant variation in the expression of the CD45 isoforms and CD27 in different patients. A 6-hour incubation of one patient’s blood with NS3 peptides resulted in the activation of the epitope-specific CD8+cells, as indicated by their expression of CD69 and IFN-γ. We also detected NS3-specific CD8+T cells in the intrahepatic lymphocyte population isolated from liver biopsies of two HCV-infected patients. The frequency of these specific CD8+cells in the liver was 1–2%, at least 30-fold higher than in the peripheral blood. All of the intrahepatic NS3-specific CD8+T cells were CD69+, suggesting that they were activated CTLs. Direct quantitation and characterization of HCV-specific CTLs should extend our understanding of the immunopathogenesis and the mechanism of clearance or persistence of HCV.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5692

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
He, X.-S., Rehermann, B., López-Labrador, F. X., Boisvert, J., Cheung, R., Mumm, J., Wedemeyer, H., Berenguer, M., Wright, T. L., Davis, M. M., & Greenberg, H. B.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1999-05-11
Volume
96
Issue
10
Pages
5692-5697
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2106544064
Cited by
417
References
2
FWCI
23.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.