The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant genetic resources: What can they contribute toward increased crop productivity?
Open accessAbstract
To feed a world population growing by up to 160 people per minute, with >90% of them in developing countries, will require an astonishing increase in food production. Forecasts call for wheat to become the most important cereal in the world, with maize close behind; together, these crops will account for ≈80% of developing countries’ cereal import requirements. Access to a range of genetic diversity is critical to the success of breeding programs. The global effort to assemble, document, and utilize these resources is enormous, and the genetic diversity in the collections is critical to the world’s fight against hunger. The introgression of genes that reduced plant height and increased disease and viral resistance in wheat provided the foundation for the “Green Revolution” and demonstrated the tremendous impact that genetic resources can have on production. Wheat hybrids and synthetics may provide the yield increases needed in the future. A wild relative of maize, Tripsacum , represents an untapped genetic resource for abiotic and biotic stress resistance and for apomixis, a trait that could provide developing world farmers access to hybrid technology. Ownership of genetic resources and genes must be resolved to ensure global access to these critical resources. The application of molecular and genetic engineering technologies enhances the use of genetic resources. The effective and complementary use of all of our technological tools and resources will be required for meeting the challenge posed by the world’s expanding demand for food.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prediction of Maize Single‐Cross Performance Using RFLPs and Information from Related Hybrids
Bernardo, R. (1994) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183x003400010003x · Cited by 379
Cited by
Zhang, Y., Bai, Y., Wu, G., Zou, S., Chen, Y., Gao, C., & Tang, D. (2017) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13599 · Cited by 525
Genetic analysis of abiotic stress tolerance in crops
Roy, S. J., Tucker, E. J., & Tester, M. (2011) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2011.03.002 · Cited by 264
Kantar, M. B., Sosa, C. C., Khoury, C. K., Castañeda-Álvarez, N. P., Achicanoy, H. A., Bernau, V., Kane, N. C., Marek, L., Seiler, G., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00841 · Cited by 76
Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping in Plants: Concepts and Approaches
Sehgal, D., Singh, R., & Rajpal, V. R. (2016) · Sustainable Development and Biodiversity · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27090-6_2 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoisington, D., Khairallah, M., Reeves, T., Ribaut, J.-M., Skovmand, B., Taba, S., & Warburton, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-05-25
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5937-5943
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1994547677
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant genetic resources: What can they contribute toward increased crop productivity? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.11.5937
- The paper
- Hoisington, D., Khairallah, M., Reeves, T., Ribaut, J.-M., Skovmand, B., Taba, S., & Warburton, M. (1999). Plant genetic resources: What can they contribute toward increased crop productivity? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.11.5937
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.