Cited by 525Powdery Mildew Fungal DiseasesWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

Simultaneous modification of three homoeologs of Ta EDR 1 by genome editing enhances powdery mildew resistance in wheat

Open access
Zhang, Yunwei, Bai, Yang, Wu, Guangheng, Zou, Shenghao, Chen, Yongfang, Gao, Caixia, Tang, Dingzhong·2017·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) incurs significant yield losses from powdery mildew, a major fungal disease caused by Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici (Bgt). enhanced disease resistance1 (EDR1) plays a negative role in the defense response against powdery mildew in Arabidopsis thaliana; however, the edr1 mutant does not show constitutively activated defense responses. This makes EDR1 an ideal target for approaches using new genome-editing tools to improve resistance to powdery mildew. We cloned TaEDR1 from hexaploid wheat and found high similarity among the three homoeologs of EDR1. Knock-down of TaEDR1 by virus-induced gene silencing or RNA interference enhanced resistance to powdery mildew, indicating that TaEDR1 negatively regulates powdery mildew resistance in wheat. We used CRISPR/Cas9 technology to generate Taedr1 wheat plants by simultaneous modification of the three homoeologs of wheat EDR1. No off-target mutations were detected in the Taedr1 mutant plants. The Taedr1 plants were resistant to powdery mildew and did not show mildew-induced cell death. Our study represents the successful generation of a potentially valuable trait using genome-editing technology in wheat and provides germplasm for disease resistance breeding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tpj.13599

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CRISPR variants Cas12 and Cas13 offered improvements in specificity and reduced off-target effects compared to Cas9.

    “The CRISPR variants Cas12 and Cas13 offered improvements in specificity and reduced off-target effects compared to Cas9 and proved to be a highly efficient gene editing tool with complementary properties and functionality to Cas9 (Zetsche et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2017).”

    From Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops (2025) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2017

    The section on knocking out TaEDR1 with CRISPR/Cas9 reports no mutations at seven predicted off-target sites in its Cas9-edited wheat plants. Our copy does not address Cas12 or Cas13 or compare their specificity and off-target effects with Cas9 (searched: Cas12, Cas13, Cpf1, and complementary properties). (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Bai, Y., Wu, G., Zou, S., Chen, Y., Gao, C., & Tang, D.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Gao, Caixia
  • Tang, Dingzhong
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06-13
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
714-724
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2612614002
Cited by
525
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 6
FWCI
32.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Plant Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB11020100, KFZD‐SW‐107)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2014DFA31540, 2015CB910202)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
homoeologs, wheat, powdery mildew resistance, Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, disease resistance breeding, virus-induced gene silencing, RNA interference
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Amino Acid Sequence, Ascomycota, Plant Diseases, Polyploidy, Triticum, Sequence Alignment, Plant Leaves, Gene Silencing, Disease Resistance, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review