CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 49

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Intranuclear localization of human papillomavirus 16 E7 during transformation and preferential binding of E7 to the Rb family member p130

Smith-McCune, K., Kalman, D., Robbins, C., Shivakumar, S., Yuschenkoff, L., Bishop, J. Michael·1999·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.96.12.6999
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

To study intracellular pathways by which the human papillomavirus 16 oncogene E7 participates in carcinogenesis, we expressed an inducible chimera of E7 by fusion to the hormone-binding domain of the estrogen receptor. The chimeric protein (E7ER) transformed rodent fibroblast cell lines and induced DNA synthesis on addition of estradiol. In coimmunoprecipitation experiments, E7ER preferentially bound p130 when compared to p107 and pRb. After estradiol addition, E7ER localization changed to a more intense intranuclear staining. Induction of E7 function was not correlated with binding to p130 or pRb but rather with intranuclear localization and modest induction of binding to p107.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.96.12.6999

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. K Vousden, J Doniger, J A DiPaolo, D R Lowy Oncogene Res 3, 167–175 (1988).
  2. 10.1016/0042-6822(88)90532-6 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1128/jvi.63.3.1465-1469.1989 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1128/jvi.64.2.519-526.1990 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1099/0022-1317-66-7-1515 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0042-6822(85)90164-3 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/314111a0 · DOI
  8. C Yee, I Krishnan-Hewlett, C C Baker, R Schlegel, P M Howley Am J Pathol 119, 361–366 (1985).
  9. 10.1128/jvi.61.4.962-971.1987 · DOI
  10. L Banks, S C Barnett, T Crook Oncogene 5, 833–837 (1990).
  11. 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90423-6 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02426.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90570-3 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1101/gad.11.16.2090 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1101/gad.11.16.2101 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1128/jvi.71.5.3451-3457.1997 · DOI
  17. 10.1128/jvi.71.7.5570-5578.1997 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1126/science.2537532 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1128/jvi.65.12.6922-6930.1991 · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4442 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06330.x · DOI
  22. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05566.x · DOI
  23. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04939.x · DOI
  24. 10.1038/340066a0 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.88.12.5114 · DOI
  26. 10.1128/mcb.13.10.6241-6252.1993 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90122-5 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04489.x · DOI
  29. 10.1128/jvi.63.6.2650-2656.1989 · DOI
  30. J D Morris, T Crook, L R Bandara, R Davies, N B LaThangue, K H Vousden Oncogene 8, 893–898 (1993).
  31. M McMahon, R C Schatzman, J M Bishop Mol Cell Biol 11, 4760–4770 (1991).
  32. 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90344-6 · DOI
  33. D A Miller, G J Rosman BioTechniques 7, 80–90 (1989).
  34. 10.1073/pnas.89.17.7958 · DOI
  35. S Nordeen BioTechniques 6, 454–457 (1988).
  36. 10.1128/mcb.2.9.1044-1051.1982 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90456-9 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03604.x · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90552-1 · DOI
  40. E Berezutskaya, B Yu, A Morozov, P Raychaudhuri, S Bagchi Cell Growth Diff 8, 1277–1286 (1997).
  41. 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90386-3 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1128/jvi.61.5.1686-1689.1987 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1099/0022-1317-68-11-2933 · DOI
  44. 10.1073/pnas.90.2.388 · DOI
  45. 10.1128/jvi.65.7.3943-3948.1991 · DOI
  46. 10.1128/jvi.67.5.2521-2528.1993 · DOI
  47. 10.1128/jvi.66.12.6893-6902.1992 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1016/S0168-9525(98)01470-X · DOI
  49. M Kiess, R M Gill, P A Hamel Cell Growth Differ 6, 1287–1298 (1995).
  50. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202031 · DOI
  51. X Mayol, J Csarriga, X Grana Oncogene 13, 237–246 (1996).
  52. 10.1128/MCB.16.4.1436 · DOI
  53. L Banks, C Edmonds, K H Vousden Oncogene 5, 1383–1389 (1990b).
  54. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08091.x · DOI
  55. 10.1073/pnas.88.12.5187 · DOI
  56. 10.1128/MCB.17.12.7268 · DOI
  57. 10.1126/science.271.5255.1595 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Smith-McCune, K., Kalman, D., Robbins, C., Shivakumar, S., Yuschenkoff, L., & Bishop, J. M.
Affiliations
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Cancer Research Institute, and Reproductive Endocrinology Center, and G. W. Hooper Foundation and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco CA 94115
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Published
1999-06-08
Volume
96
Issue
12
Pages
6999-7004
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.96.12.6999
Cited by
49
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review