The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differentiation between vasculoprotective and uterotrophic effects of ligands with different binding affinities to estrogen receptors α and β
Open accessAbstract
Estrogen-based drug therapy in cardiovascular diseases has been difficult because it has not been possible to separate the wanted vasculoprotective effect from the unwanted effects of the hormone to the reproductive system. Here, we demonstrate that, after endothelial denudation of rat carotid artery, the mRNA of the classical estrogen receptor (ERα) is constitutively expressed at a low level whereas the expression of the novel ERβ mRNA increases >40-fold. Under in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, ERβ mRNA and protein colocalize with the smooth muscle cells in the media and neointima. Treatment of ovariectomized female rats with the isoflavone phytoestrogen genistein, which shows 20-fold higher binding affinity to ERβ than to ERα, or with 17β-estradiol, which does not differentiate between the two receptors, provides similar dose-dependent vasculoprotective effect in rat carotid injury model. In addition in concentrations <10 μM, both ligands are equally inhibitory to the replication and migration of smooth muscle cells in vitro . However, only treatment with 17β-estradiol, but not with genistein, is accompanied with a dose-dependent uterotrophic effect. The results suggest that preferential targeting to ERβ will provide vasculoprotective estrogen analogs devoid of effects to the reproductive system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The pros and cons of phytoestrogens
Patisaul, H. B., & Jefferson, W. (2010) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.03.003 · Cited by 746
Meyers, M. J., Sun, J., Carlson, K. E., Marriner, G. A., Katzenellenbogen, B. S., & Katzenellenbogen, J. A. (2001) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm010254a · Cited by 678
Estrogen replacement therapy, atherosclerosis, and vascular function
Mikkola, T. (2002) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1016/s0008-6363(01)00466-7 · Cited by 420
An, J., Tzagarakis-Foster, C., Scharschmidt, T. C., Lomri, N., & Leitman, D. C. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m100953200 · Cited by 323
Katzenellenbogen, B. S., & Katzenellenbogen, J. A. (2000) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/bcr78 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Mäkelä, S., Savolainen, H., Aavik, E., Myllärniemi, M., Strauss, L., Taskinen, E., Gustafsson, J.-Å., & Häyry, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-06-08
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7077-7082
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2020658832
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differentiation between vasculoprotective and uterotrophic effects of ligands with different binding affinities to estrogen receptors α and β. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.12.7077
- The paper
- Mäkelä, S., Savolainen, H., Aavik, E., Myllärniemi, M., Strauss, L., Taskinen, E., Gustafsson, J.-Å., & Häyry, P. (1999). Differentiation between vasculoprotective and uterotrophic effects of ligands with different binding affinities to estrogen receptors α and β. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.12.7077
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.