The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treatment of noninfectious intermediate and posterior uveitis with the humanized anti-Tac mAb: A phase I/II clinical trial
Open accessAbstract
To evaluate the safety and potential therapeutic activity of humanized anti-IL-2 receptor mAb (Daclizumab) therapy in the treatment of patients with severe, sight-threatening, intermediate and posterior noninfectious uveitis, a nonrandomized, open-label, pilot study was performed. Patients with uveitis were treated with a minimum of 20 mg of prednisone, cyclosporine, antimetabolites, or any combination of these agents were eligible. Patients were weaned off their systemic immunosuppressive agents according to a standardized schedule, while ultimately receiving Daclizumab infusions every 4 weeks. Anti-IL-2 receptor antibody therapy, given intravenously with intervals of up to 4 weeks in lieu of standard immunosuppressive therapy, appeared to prevent the expression of severe sight-threatening intraocular inflammatory disease in 8 of 10 patients treated over a 12-month period, with noted improvements in visual acuity. One patient met a primary endpoint with a loss of vision of 10 letters or more from baseline in one eye and another patient discontinued therapy because of evidence of increased ocular inflammation. All patients were able to tolerate the study medications without the need for dose reduction. We report effective long-term use of anti-IL-2 therapy for an autoimmune indication. These initial findings would suggest that anti-IL-2 receptor therapy may be an effective therapeutic approach for uveitis and, by implication, other disorders with a predominant Th1 profile.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kreitman, R. J., Wilson, W. H., White, J. D., Stetler-Stevenson, M., Jaffe, E. S., Giardina, S., Waldmann, T. A., & Pastan, I. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2000.18.8.1622 · Cited by 420
Self-citationSuhler, E. B. (2005) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.123.7.903 · Cited by 306
Wuest, S. C., Edwan, J. H., Martin, J. F., Han, S., Perry, J. S. A., Cartagena, C. M., Matsuura, E., Maric, D., Waldmann, T. A., & Bielekova, B. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2365 · Cited by 284
Self-citationAge-related macular degeneration and the immune response: implications for therapy
Nussenblatt, R. B., & Ferris, F. (2007) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.06.025 · Cited by 130
Self-citationAdvances in interleukin 2 receptor targeted treatment
Morris, J. C., & Waldmann, T. A. (2000) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.59.suppl_1.i109 · Cited by 131
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nussenblatt, R. B., Fortin, E., Schiffman, R., Rizzo, L., Smith, J., Van Veldhuisen, P., Sran, P., Yaffe, A., Goldman, C. K., Waldmann, T. A., & Whitcup, S. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-06-22
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 7462-7466
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2145153016
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of noninfectious intermediate and posterior uveitis with the humanized anti-Tac mAb: A phase I/II clinical trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.13.7462
- The paper
- Nussenblatt, R. B., Fortin, E., Schiffman, R., Rizzo, L., Smith, J., Van Veldhuisen, P., Sran, P., Yaffe, A., Goldman, C. K., Waldmann, T. A., & Whitcup, S. M. (1999). Treatment of noninfectious intermediate and posterior uveitis with the humanized anti-Tac mAb: A phase I/II clinical trial. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.13.7462
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.