The DOI matches its Crossref record.
UmuD′ 2 C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli pol V
Open accessAbstract
The damage-inducible UmuD′ and UmuC proteins are required for most SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli . Our recent assay to reconstitute this process in vitro , using a native UmuD′ 2 C complex, revealed that the highly purified preparation contained DNA polymerase activity. Here we eliminate the possibility that this activity is caused by a contaminating DNA polymerase and show that it is intrinsic to UmuD′ 2 C. E. coli dinB has recently been shown to have DNA polymerase activity (pol IV). We suggest that UmuD′ 2 C, the fifth DNA polymerase discovered in E. coli , be designated as E. coli pol V. In the presence of RecA, β sliding clamp, γ clamp loading complex, and E. coli single-stranded binding protein (SSB), pol V’s polymerase activity is highly “error prone” at both damaged and undamaged DNA template sites, catalyzing efficient bypass of abasic lesions that would otherwise severely inhibit replication by pol III holoenzyme complex (HE). Pol V bypasses a site-directed abasic lesion with an efficiency about 100- to 150-fold higher than pol III HE. In accordance with the “A-rule,” dAMP is preferentially incorporated opposite the lesion. A pol V mutant, UmuD′ 2 C104 (D101N), has no measurable lesion bypass activity. A kinetic analysis shows that addition of increasing amounts of pol III to a fixed level of pol V inhibits lesion bypass, demonstrating that both enzymes compete for free 3′-OH template-primer ends. We show, however, that despite competition for primer-3′-ends, pol V and pol III HE can nevertheless interact synergistically to stimulate synthesis downstream from a template lesion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The importance of repairing stalled replication forks
Cox, M. M., Goodman, M. F., Kreuzer, K. N., Sherratt, D. J., Sandler, S. J., & Marians, K. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35003501 · Cited by 1,044
Self-citationKunkel, T. A., & Bebenek, K. (2000) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.497 · Cited by 1,003
Error-Prone Repair DNA Polymerases in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
Goodman, M. F. (2002) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.083101.124707 · Cited by 727
Self-citationY-family DNA polymerases and their role in tolerance of cellular DNA damage
Sale, J. E., Lehmann, A. R., & Woodgate, R. (2012) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3289 · Cited by 665
Self-citationCrystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Ling, H., Boudsocq, F., Woodgate, R., & Yang, W. (2001) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00515-3 · Cited by 610
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, M., Shen, X., Frank, E. G., O’Donnell, M., Woodgate, R., & Goodman, M. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-08-03
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 8919-8924
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2115952866
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: UmuD′ 2 C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli pol V. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.16.8919
- The paper
- Tang, M., Shen, X., Frank, E. G., O’Donnell, M., Woodgate, R., & Goodman, M. F. (1999). UmuD′ 2 C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli pol V. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.16.8919
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.