Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 536

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

UmuD′ 2 C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli pol V

Open access
Tang, Mengjia, Shen, Xuan, Frank, Ekaterina G., O’Donnell, Mike, Woodgate, Roger, Goodman, Myron F.·1999·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The damage-inducible UmuD′ and UmuC proteins are required for most SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli . Our recent assay to reconstitute this process in vitro , using a native UmuD′ 2 C complex, revealed that the highly purified preparation contained DNA polymerase activity. Here we eliminate the possibility that this activity is caused by a contaminating DNA polymerase and show that it is intrinsic to UmuD′ 2 C. E. coli dinB has recently been shown to have DNA polymerase activity (pol IV). We suggest that UmuD′ 2 C, the fifth DNA polymerase discovered in E. coli , be designated as E. coli pol V. In the presence of RecA, β sliding clamp, γ clamp loading complex, and E. coli single-stranded binding protein (SSB), pol V’s polymerase activity is highly “error prone” at both damaged and undamaged DNA template sites, catalyzing efficient bypass of abasic lesions that would otherwise severely inhibit replication by pol III holoenzyme complex (HE). Pol V bypasses a site-directed abasic lesion with an efficiency about 100- to 150-fold higher than pol III HE. In accordance with the “A-rule,” dAMP is preferentially incorporated opposite the lesion. A pol V mutant, UmuD′ 2 C104 (D101N), has no measurable lesion bypass activity. A kinetic analysis shows that addition of increasing amounts of pol III to a fixed level of pol V inhibits lesion bypass, demonstrating that both enzymes compete for free 3′-OH template-primer ends. We show, however, that despite competition for primer-3′-ends, pol V and pol III HE can nevertheless interact synergistically to stimulate synthesis downstream from a template lesion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.96.16.8919

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 536

Metadata

Authors
Tang, M., Shen, X., Frank, E. G., O’Donnell, M., Woodgate, R., & Goodman, M. F.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1999-08-03
Volume
96
Issue
16
Pages
8919-8924
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2115952866
Cited by
536
References
0
FWCI
18.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: UmuD′ 2 C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli pol V. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.16.8919
The paper
Tang, M., Shen, X., Frank, E. G., O’Donnell, M., Woodgate, R., & Goodman, M. F. (1999). UmuD′ 2 C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli pol V. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.16.8919

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.