The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sterols regulate cycling of SREBP cleavage-activating protein (SCAP) between endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi
Abstract
The proteolytic cleavage of sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBPs) is regulated by SREBP cleavage-activating protein (SCAP), which forms complexes with SREBPs in membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). In sterol-depleted cells, SCAP facilitates cleavage of SREBPs by Site-1 protease, thereby initiating release of active NH 2 -terminal fragments from the ER membrane so that they can enter the nucleus and activate gene expression. In sterol-overloaded cells, the activity of SCAP is blocked, SREBPs remain bound to membranes, and transcription of sterol-regulated genes declines. Here, we provide evidence that sterols act by inhibiting the cycling of SCAP between the ER and Golgi. We use glycosidases, glycosidase inhibitors, and a glycosylation-defective mutant cell line to demonstrate that the N-linked carbohydrates of SCAP are modified by Golgi enzymes in sterol-depleted cells. After modification, SCAP returns to the ER, as indicated by experiments that show that the Golgi-modified forms of SCAP cofractionate with ER membranes on density gradients. In sterol-overloaded cells, the Golgi modifications of SCAP do not occur, apparently because SCAP fails to leave the ER. Golgi modifications of SCAP are restored when sterol-overloaded cells are treated with brefeldin A, which causes Golgi enzymes to translocate to the ER. These studies suggest that sterols regulate the cleavage of SREBPs by modulating the ability of SCAP to transport SREBPs to a post-ER compartment that houses active Site-1 protease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sensitivity to Endo-H together with Golgi localization suggests SPRING is present in the cis/medial Golgi, where the SCAP-SREBP-S1P machinery is located.
“Together with the observed localization of SPRING in the Golgi (Fig. 5b), sensitivity to Endo-H suggests that SPRING is present in the cis/medial Golgi, which is where the SCAP-SREBP-S1P machinery is located32,33.”
From Haploid genetic screens identify SPRING/C12ORF49 as a determinant of SREBP signaling and cholesterol metabolism (2020) · cites this paper as [32]
The citation is attached to the proposed location of the SCAP–SREBP–S1P machinery, not to SPRING’s localization. The Discussion says the compartment containing active S1P is unknown and describes SREBP cleavage as occurring in a pre-Golgi compartment; the Results say most SCAP resides in the ER at steady state. These passages do not place the machinery in the cis/medial Golgi. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gottlieb, C., Baenziger, J., & Kornfeld, S. (1975) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)41514-7 · Cited by 224
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80213-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81362-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.272.32.20213 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80150-1 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13709 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.95.22.12848 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.273.27.17243 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.bi.54.070185.003215 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)84879-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)46950-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1083/jcb.126.1.41 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0076-6879(90)82018-W · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0003-2697(89)90115-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0076-6879(94)30021-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90161-8 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.122.1.39 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4734 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90034-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/prep.1996.0015 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90685-5 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.71.11.4288 · DOI
- 10.1016/0076-6879(83)98152-1 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.270.14.8023 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.273.10.5785 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.274.32.22795 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.272.19.12778 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ER Stress Induces Cleavage of Membrane-Bound ATF6 by the Same Proteases that Process SREBPs
Ye, J., Rawson, R. B., Komuro, R., Chen, X., Davé, U. P., Prywes, R., Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L. (2000) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00133-7 · Cited by 1,871
Self-citationKong, W., Wei, J., Abidi, P., Lin, M., Inaba, S., Li, C., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Si, S., Pan, H., et al. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1135 · Cited by 1,391
Unsaturated Fatty Acids Down-regulate SREBP Isoforms 1a and 1c by Two Mechanisms in HEK-293 Cells
Hannah, V. C., Ou, J., Luong, A., Goldstein, J. L., & Brown, M. S. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m007273200 · Cited by 448
Self-citationCD36 promotes de novo lipogenesis in hepatocytes through INSIG2-dependent SREBP1 processing
Zeng, H., Qin, H., Liao, M., Zheng, E., Luo, X., Xiao, A., Li, Y., Chen, L., Wei, L., Zhao, L., et al. (2022) · Molecular Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2021.101428 · Cited by 211
Janowski, B. A. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.202471599 · Cited by 79
Mastrocola, R., Collino, M., Rogazzo, M., Medana, C., Nigro, D., Boccuzzi, G., & Aragno, M. (2013) · American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00450.2012 · Cited by 63
Loregger, A., Raaben, M., Nieuwenhuis, J., Tan, J. M. E., Jae, L. T., van den Hengel, L. G., Hendrix, S., van den Berg, M., Scheij, S., Song, J.-Y., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14811-1 · Cited by 51
Bat‐Ochir, C., Kwak, J., Koh, S., Jeon, M., Chung, D., Lee, Y., & Chae, S. (2016) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/mmi.13341 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Nohturfft, A., DeBose-Boyd, R. A., Scheek, S., Goldstein, J. L., & Brown, M. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-09-28
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 11235-11240
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review