Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Autocatalytic Processing of Site-1 Protease Removes Propeptide and Permits Cleavage of Sterol Regulatory Element-binding Proteins

Espenshade, Peter J., Cheng, Dong, Goldstein, Joseph L., Brown, Michael S.·1999·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.274.32.22795

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • S1P is synthesized as an inactive precursor and undergoes multiple processing of its N-terminal prodomain involving the catalytic triad D218/H249/S414, generating S1P-A, S1P-B'/B, and S1P-C'/C.

    “S1P is synthesized as an inactive precursor whose domain organization is shown in Fig. 4C. To become mature, S1P undergoes multiple processing of the N-terminal prodomain involving the catalytic triad D218/H249/S414, generating three shortened forms designated S1P-A, S1P-B’/B and S1P-C’/C (Espenshade et al., 1999; Elagoz et al., 2002; da Palma et al., 2014).”

    From POST1/C12ORF49 regulates the SREBP pathway by promoting site-1 protease maturation (2021) · cites this paper as Espenshade et al., 1999

  • S1P cleavage at the B'/B sites is required for subsequent cleavage at the C'/C sites.

    “These results are consistent with the earlier work (Espenshade et al., 1999; da Palma et al., 2014), and suggest that S1P cleavage at the B’/B sites is required for subsequent cleavage at the C’/C sites.”

    From POST1/C12ORF49 regulates the SREBP pathway by promoting site-1 protease maturation (2021) · cites this paper as Espenshade et al., 1999

  • Autoprocessing at the C'/C sites occurs in trans involving another S1P protein.

    “autoprocessing at the C’/C sites is reported to occur in trans involving another S1P protein (Espenshade et al., 1999; da Palma et al., 2014)”

    From POST1/C12ORF49 regulates the SREBP pathway by promoting site-1 protease maturation (2021) · cites this paper as Espenshade et al., 1999

  • S1P-B'/B can already cleave the SREBP2 precursor and activate downstream signaling.

    “Another unique aspect of S1P is that it needs not to be completely processed to become enzymatically active, as S1P-B’/B can already cleave the SREBP2 precursor and activate the downstream signaling (Espenshade et al., 1999; da Palma et al., 2014).”

    From POST1/C12ORF49 regulates the SREBP pathway by promoting site-1 protease maturation (2021) · cites this paper as Espenshade et al., 1999

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Brown, 1997, Cell, 89, 331, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80213-5 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Sakai, 1998, Mol. Cell, 2, 505, 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80150-1 · DOI
  3. Sakai, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 5785, 10.1074/jbc.273.10.5785 · DOI
  4. Duncan, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 12778, 10.1074/jbc.272.19.12778 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Rawson, 1997, Mol. Cell, 1, 47, 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80006-4 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Duncan, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 17801, 10.1074/jbc.273.28.17801 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hua, 1996, Cell, 87, 415, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81362-8 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Rawson, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 28261, 10.1074/jbc.273.43.28261 · DOI
  9. Nagase, 1995, DNA Res., 2, 37, 10.1093/dnares/2.1.37 · DOI
  10. Siezen, 1997, Protein Sci., 6, 501, 10.1002/pro.5560060301 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Brown, 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
  12. Nakayama, 1997, Biochem. J., 327, 625, 10.1042/bj3270625 · DOI
  13. Sørensen, 1993, Biochemistry, 32, 8994, 10.1021/bi00086a003 · DOI
  14. Seidah, 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 96, 1321, 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1321 · DOI
  15. Leibrock, 1989, Nature, 341, 149, 10.1038/341149a0 · DOI
  16. Rosenfeld, 1995, Protein Expression Purif., 6, 465, 10.1006/prep.1995.1062 · DOI
  17. Cheng, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 22805, 10.1074/jbc.274.32.22805 · DOI
  18. Wang, 1994, Cell, 77, 53, 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90234-8 · DOI
  19. Nohturfft, 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 95, 12848, 10.1073/pnas.95.22.12848 · DOI
  20. Goldstein, 1983, Methods Enzymol., 98, 241, 10.1016/0076-6879(83)98152-1 · DOI
  21. Hua, 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 10379, 10.1074/jbc.271.17.10379 · DOI
  22. Akusjarvi, 1987, Mol. Cell. Biol., 7, 549
  23. Hua, 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 29422, 10.1074/jbc.270.49.29422 · DOI
  24. Sakai, 1996, Cell, 85, 1037, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81304-5 · DOI
  25. Laemmli, 1970, Nature, 227, 680, 10.1038/227680a0 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Nohturfft, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 17243, 10.1074/jbc.273.27.17243 · DOI
  27. Hebert, 1995, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 60, 405, 10.1101/SQB.1995.060.01.045 · DOI
  28. Leduc, 1992, J. Biol. Chem., 267, 14304, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)49712-3 · DOI
  29. Anderson, 1997, EMBO J., 16, 1508, 10.1093/emboj/16.7.1508 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Espenshade, P. J., Cheng, D., Goldstein, J. L., & Brown, M. S.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-08
Volume
274
Issue
32
Pages
22795-22804
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
161
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review