The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A simple model for calculating the kinetics of protein folding from three-dimensional structures
Open accessAbstract
An elementary statistical mechanical model was used to calculate the folding rates for 22 proteins from their known three-dimensional structures. In this model, residues come into contact only after all of the intervening chain is in the native conformation. An additional simplifying assumption is that native structure grows from localized regions that then fuse to form the complete native molecule. The free energy function for this model contains just two contributions—conformational entropy of the backbone and the energy of the inter-residue contacts. The matrix of inter-residue interactions is obtained from the atomic coordinates of the three-dimensional structure. For the 18 proteins that exhibit two-state equilibrium and kinetic behavior, profiles of the free energy versus the number of native peptide bonds show two deep minima, corresponding to the native and denatured states. For four proteins known to exhibit intermediates in folding, the free energy profiles show additional deep minima. The calculated rates of folding the two-state proteins, obtained by solving a diffusion equation for motion on the free energy profiles, reproduce the experimentally determined values surprisingly well. The success of these calculations suggests that folding speed is largely determined by the distribution and strength of contacts in the native structure. We also calculated the effect of mutations on the folding kinetics of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2, the most intensively studied two-state protein, with some success.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
THEORY OF PROTEIN FOLDING: The Energy Landscape Perspective
Onuchic, J. N., Luthey-Schulten, Z., & Wolynes, P. G. (1997) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.545 · Cited by 2,210
Elucidating the folding problem of helical peptides using empirical parameters
Muñoz, V., & Serrano, L. (1994) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0694-399 · Cited by 721
Self-citation
Cited by
Guerois, R., Nielsen, J. E., & Serrano, L. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00442-4 · Cited by 1,728
Native contacts determine protein folding mechanisms in atomistic simulations
Best, R. B., Hummer, G., & Eaton, W. A. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1311599110 · Cited by 594
Self-citationProtein Folding Theory: From Lattice to All-Atom Models
Mirny, L., & Shakhnovich, E. (2001) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.30.1.361 · Cited by 341
Fersht, A. R. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.4.1525 · Cited by 320
Ferreiro, D. U., Komives, E. A., & Wolynes, P. G. (2014) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583514000092 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Muñoz, V., & Eaton, W. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-09-28
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 11311-11316
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2165222310
- Cited by
- 636
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A simple model for calculating the kinetics of protein folding from three-dimensional structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.20.11311
- The paper
- Muñoz, V., & Eaton, W. A. (1999). A simple model for calculating the kinetics of protein folding from three-dimensional structures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.20.11311
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.