The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transition-state structure as a unifying basis in protein-folding mechanisms: Contact order, chain topology, stability, and the extended nucleus mechanism
Open accessAbstract
I attempt to reconcile apparently conflicting factors and mechanisms that have been proposed to determine the rate constant for two-state folding of small proteins, on the basis of general features of the structures of transition states. Φ-Value analysis implies a transition state for folding that resembles an expanded and distorted native structure, which is built around an extended nucleus. The nucleus is composed predominantly of elements of partly or well-formed native secondary structure that are stabilized by local and long-range tertiary interactions. These long-range interactions give rise to connecting loops, frequently containing the native loops that are poorly structured. I derive an equation that relates differences in the contact order of a protein to changes in the length of linking loops, which, in turn, is directly related to the unfavorable free energy of the loops in the transition state. Kinetic data on loop extension mutants of CI2 and α-spectrin SH3 domain fit the equation qualitatively. The rate of folding depends primarily on the interactions that directly stabilize the nucleus, especially those in native-like secondary structure and those resulting from the entropy loss from the connecting loops, which vary with contact order. This partitioning of energy accounts for the success of some algorithms that predict folding rates, because they use these principles either explicitly or implicitly. The extended nucleus model thus unifies the observations of rate depending on both stability and topology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions
Kramers, H. A. (1940) · Physica · doi:10.1016/s0031-8914(40)90098-2 · Cited by 8,625
Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science: A Guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding
Fersht, A. (2017) · Series in Structural Biology · doi:10.1142/10574 · Cited by 2,039
Self-citationStructure and Mechanism in Protein Science. A guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding
Howland, J. L. (2001) · Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education · Cited by 1,823
Plaxco, K. W., Simons, K. T., & Baker, D. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.1645 · Cited by 1,518
Itzhaki, L. S., Otzen, D. E., & Fersht, A. R. (1995) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1995.0616 · Cited by 733
Self-citationMapping the transition state and pathway of protein folding by protein engineering
Matouschek, A., Kellis, J. T., Serrano, L., & Fersht, A. R. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/340122a0 · Cited by 703
Self-citationA simple model for calculating the kinetics of protein folding from three-dimensional structures
Muñoz, V., & Eaton, W. A. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.20.11311 · Cited by 636
Nucleation mechanisms in protein folding
Fersht, A. R. (1997) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80002-4 · Cited by 545
Self-citationIs protein folding hierarchic? I. Local structure and peptide folding
Baldwin, R. L., & Rose, G. D. (1999) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01346-2 · Cited by 492
Specific Nucleus as the Transition State for Protein Folding: Evidence from the Lattice Model
Abkevich, V. I., Gutin, A. M., & Shakhnovich, E. I. (1994) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00199a029 · Cited by 470
Cited by
Protein folding and misfolding
Dobson, C. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02261 · Cited by 4,791
Modeling of loops in protein structures
Fiser, A., Do, R. K. G., & Šali, A. (2000) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.9.9.1753 · Cited by 2,116
The present view of the mechanism of protein folding
Daggett, V., & Fersht, A. (2003) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1126 · Cited by 398
Self-citationProtein Folding Theory: From Lattice to All-Atom Models
Mirny, L., & Shakhnovich, E. (2001) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.30.1.361 · Cited by 341
Structural determinants of co-translational protein complex assembly
Mallik, S., Venezian, J., Lobov, A., Heidenreich, M., Garcia-Seisdedos, H., Yeates, T. O., Shiber, A., & Levy, E. D. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.11.013 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Fersht, A. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-02-15
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1525-1529
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2076430296
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 10.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transition-state structure as a unifying basis in protein-folding mechanisms: Contact order, chain topology, stability, and the extended nucleus mechanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.97.4.1525
- The paper
- Fersht, A. R. (2000). Transition-state structure as a unifying basis in protein-folding mechanisms: Contact order, chain topology, stability, and the extended nucleus mechanism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.4.1525
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.