The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Duplicated genes evolve independently after polyploid formation in cotton
Open accessAbstract
Of the many processes that generate gene duplications, polyploidy is unique in that entire genomes are duplicated. This process has been important in the evolution of many eukaryotic groups, and it occurs with high frequency in plants. Recent evidence suggests that polyploidization may be accompanied by rapid genomic changes, but the evolutionary fate of discrete loci recently doubled by polyploidy (homoeologues) has not been studied. Here we use locus-specific isolation techniques with comparative mapping to characterize the evolution of homoeologous loci in allopolyploid cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum ) and in species representing its diploid progenitors. We isolated and sequenced 16 loci from both genomes of the allopolyploid, from both progenitor diploid genomes and appropriate outgroups. Phylogenetic analysis of the resulting 73.5 kb of sequence data demonstrated that for all 16 loci (14.7 kb/genome), the topology expected from organismal history was recovered. In contrast to observations involving repetitive DNAs in cotton, there was no evidence of interaction among duplicated genes in the allopolyploid. Polyploidy was not accompanied by an obvious increase in mutations indicative of pseudogene formation. Additionally, differences in rates of divergence among homoeologues in polyploids and orthologues in diploids were indistinguishable across loci, with significant rate deviation restricted to two putative pseudogenes. Our results indicate that most duplicated genes in allopolyploid cotton evolve independently of each other and at the same rate as those of their diploid progenitors. These indications of genic stasis accompanying polyploidization provide a sharp contrast to recent examples of rapid genomic evolution in allopolyploids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hudson, R. R., & Kaplan, N. L. (1985) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/111.1.147 · Cited by 1,555
Cited by
Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference
Álvarez, I., & Wendel, J. F. (2003) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00208-2 · Cited by 1,877
Self-citationAdvances in the study of polyploidy since Plant speciation
Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., & Tate, J. A. (2004) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00948.x · Cited by 720
Utility of Low-Copy Nuclear Gene Sequences in Plant Phylogenetics
Sang, T. (2002) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1080/10409230290771474 · Cited by 357
Polyploid formation in cotton is not accompanied by rapid genomic changes
Liu, B., Brubaker, C. L., Mergeai, G., Cronn, R. C., & Wendel, J. F. (2001) · Genome · doi:10.1139/g01-011 · Cited by 353
Self-citationRate Variation Among Nuclear Genes and the Age of Polyploidy in Gossypium
Senchina, D. S. (2003) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msg065 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Cronn, R. C., Small, R. L., & Wendel, J. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-12-07
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 14406-14411
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2080491819
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Duplicated genes evolve independently after polyploid formation in cotton. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.25.14406
- The paper
- Cronn, R. C., Small, R. L., & Wendel, J. F. (1999). Duplicated genes evolve independently after polyploid formation in cotton. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.25.14406
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.