The DOI matches its Crossref record; 166 of the 166 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in the study of polyploidy since Plant speciation
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Enormous strides have been made in the study of polyploidy over the last 20 yr. Here, we highlight some of these discoveries and note where our understanding of polyploid evolution has changed. Genetic and genomic studies have dramatically altered the polyploidy paradigm. The estimated frequency of polyploidy has increased, and it is now recognized that multiple origins are the rule for most polyploids. Likewise, autopolyploidy is much more common than traditionally maintained. Rapid genomic rearrangements, genomic downsizing, movement of genetic elements across genomes, and the movement of foreign genetic materials into the polyploid genome illustrate the complex dynamics of polyploid genomes. Following polyploidization, both genetic and epigenetic mechanisms may play an important role in altering gene expression. Ecological studies reveal that plant polyploidy can have profound effects on interactions with animal herbivores and pollinators and that polyploidy may trigger changes in the reproductive biology of a species. Despite the recent advances in our understanding of polyploid evolution, many exciting aspects remain under‐investigated. Some of these include the consequences of genetic and genomic changes in natural polyploid populations, the physiological and ecological effects of polyploidy, and whether recurrent polyploidy prompts evolution to repeat itself.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ohno, S. (1970) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-86659-3 · Cited by 7,833
The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · Cited by 4,988
Chromosomal evolution in higher plants
Stebbins, G. L. (1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,074
Variation and Evolution in Plants
Stebbins, G. L. (1950) · doi:10.7312/steb94536 · Cited by 2,704
Polyploid incidence and evolution
Otto, S. P., & Whitton, J. (2000) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401 · Cited by 2,363
PATHWAYS, MECHANISMS, AND RATES OF POLYPLOID FORMATION IN FLOWERING PLANTS
Ramsey, J., & Schemske, D. W. (1998) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.467 · Cited by 1,934
Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference
Álvarez, I., & Wendel, J. F. (2003) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00208-2 · Cited by 1,877
Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome
Wolfe, K. H., & Shields, D. C. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/42711 · Cited by 1,785
Natural Hybridization and Evolution
Arnold, M. L. (1997) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195099744.001.0001 · Cited by 1,785
Grant, V. (1981) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/gran92318 · Cited by 1,741
Cited by
Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification
Soltis, D. E., Albert, V. A., Leebens‐Mack, J., Bell, C. D., Paterson, A. H., Zheng, C., Sankoff, D., de Pamphilis, C. W., Wall, P. K., & Soltis, P. S. (2009) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.0800079 · Cited by 1,257
Self-citationThe evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications
Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S., & Meyer, A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2600 · Cited by 1,129
Autopolyploidy in angiosperms: Have we grossly underestimated the number of species?
(2007) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/25065732 · Cited by 452
Self-citationOn the relative abundance of autopolyploids and allopolyploids
Barker, M. S., Arrigo, N., Baniaga, A. E., Li, Z., & Levin, D. A. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13698 · Cited by 393
Polyploidy, the Nucleotype, and Novelty: The Impact of Genome Doubling on the Biology of the Cell
Doyle, J. J., & Coate, J. E. (2019) · International Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1086/700636 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., & Tate, J. A.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-11-24
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 173-191
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W1820518573
- Cited by
- 720
- References
- 166
- FWCI
- 26.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in the study of polyploidy since Plant speciation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00948.x
- The paper
- Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., & Tate, J. A. (2004). Advances in the study of polyploidy since Plant speciation. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00948.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.