The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolutionary relationships among diverse bacteriophages and prophages: All the world’s a phage
Open accessAbstract
We report DNA and predicted protein sequence similarities, implying homology, among genes of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) bacteriophages and prophages spanning a broad phylogenetic range of host bacteria. The sequence matches reported here establish genetic connections, not always direct, among the lambdoid phages of Escherichia coli , phage φC31 of Streptomyces , phages of Mycobacterium , a previously unrecognized cryptic prophage, φflu, in the Haemophilus influenzae genome, and two small prophage-like elements, φRv1 and φRv2, in the genome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis . The results imply that these phage genes, and very possibly all of the dsDNA tailed phages, share common ancestry. We propose a model for the genetic structure and dynamics of the global phage population in which all dsDNA phage genomes are mosaics with access, by horizontal exchange, to a large common genetic pool but in which access to the gene pool is not uniform for all phage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence
Cole, S. T., Brosch, R., Parkhill, J., Garnier, T., Churcher, C., Harris, D., Gordon, S. V., Eiglmeier, K., Gas, S., Barry, C. E., et al. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31159 · Cited by 7,847
Prokaryotes: The unseen majority
Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C., & Wiebe, W. J. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578 · Cited by 4,871
Molecular analysis of genetic differences between Mycobacterium bovis BCG and virulent M. bovis
Mahairas, G. G., Sabo, P. J., Hickey, M. J., Singh, D. C., & Stover, C. K. (1996) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.178.5.1274-1282.1996 · Cited by 1,103
Cited by
CRISPR Provides Acquired Resistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes
Barrangou, R., Fremaux, C., Deveau, H., Richards, M., Boyaval, P., Moineau, S., Romero, D. A., & Horvath, P. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138140 · Cited by 5,947
Ecology of prokaryotic viruses
Weinbauer, M. G. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2003.08.001 · Cited by 1,771
Makarova, K. S., Grishin, N. V., Shabalina, S. A., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2006) · Biology Direct · doi:10.1186/1745-6150-1-7 · Cited by 1,199
Functional metagenomic profiling of nine biomes
Dinsdale, E. A., Edwards, R. A., Hall, D., Angly, F., Breitbart, M., Brulc, J. M., Furlan, M., Desnues, C., Haynes, M., Li, L., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06810 · Cited by 980
Here a virus, there a virus, everywhere the same virus?
Breitbart, M., & Rohwer, F. (2005) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2005.04.003 · Cited by 854
Metadata
- Authors
- Hendrix, R. W., Smith, M. C. M., Burns, R. N., Ford, M. E., & Hatfull, G. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-03-02
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2192-2197
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2078689375
- Cited by
- 1,107
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 47.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolutionary relationships among diverse bacteriophages and prophages: All the world’s a phage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.5.2192
- The paper
- Hendrix, R. W., Smith, M. C. M., Burns, R. N., Ford, M. E., & Hatfull, G. F. (1999). Evolutionary relationships among diverse bacteriophages and prophages: All the world’s a phage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.5.2192
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
