The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engineering the largest RNA virus genome as an infectious bacterial artificial chromosome
Open accessAbstract
The construction of cDNA clones encoding large-size RNA molecules of biological interest, like coronavirus genomes, which are among the largest mature RNA molecules known to biology, has been hampered by the instability of those cDNAs in bacteria. Herein, we show that the application of two strategies, cloning of the cDNAs into a bacterial artificial chromosome and nuclear expression of RNAs that are typically produced within the cytoplasm, is useful for the engineering of large RNA molecules. A cDNA encoding an infectious coronavirus RNA genome has been cloned as a bacterial artificial chromosome. The rescued coronavirus conserved all of the genetic markers introduced throughout the sequence and showed a standard mRNA pattern and the antigenic characteristics expected for the synthetic virus. The cDNA was transcribed within the nucleus, and the RNA translocated to the cytoplasm. Interestingly, the recovered virus had essentially the same sequence as the original one, and no splicing was observed. The cDNA was derived from an attenuated isolate that replicates exclusively in the respiratory tract of swine. During the engineering of the infectious cDNA, the spike gene of the virus was replaced by the spike gene of an enteric isolate. The synthetic virus replicated abundantly in the enteric tract and was fully virulent, demonstrating that the tropism and virulence of the recovered coronavirus can be modified. This demonstration opens up the possibility of employing this infectious cDNA as a vector for vaccine development in human, porcine, canine, and feline species susceptible to group 1 coronaviruses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RNA VIRUS MUTATIONS AND FITNESS FOR SURVIVAL
Domingo, E., & Holland, J. J. (1997) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.51.1.151 · Cited by 1,514
Cited by
Coronavirus biology and replication: implications for SARS-CoV-2
V’kovski, P., Kratzel, A., Steiner, S., Stalder, H., & Thiel, V. (2021) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-020-00468-6 · Cited by 3,197
The Molecular Biology of Coronaviruses
Masters, P. S. (2006) · Advances in Virus Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-3527(06)66005-3 · Cited by 1,761
SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Genetics Reveals a Variable Infection Gradient in the Respiratory Tract
Hou, Y. J., Okuda, K., Edwards, C. E., Martinez, D. R., Asakura, T., Dinnon, K. H., Kato, T., Lee, R. E., Yount, B. L., Mascenik, T. M., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.042 · Cited by 1,488
Coronavirus Pathogenesis and the Emerging Pathogen Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus
Weiss, S. R., & Navas-Martin, S. (2005) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.69.4.635-664.2005 · Cited by 1,256
En Passant Mutagenesis: A Two Step Markerless Red Recombination System
Tischer, B. K., Smith, G. A., & Osterrieder, N. (2010) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-652-8_30 · Cited by 599
Metadata
- Authors
- Almazán, F., González, J. M., Pénzes, Z., Izeta, A., Calvo, E., Plana-Durán, J., & Enjuanes, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-05-09
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5516-5521
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1994955540
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 48.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering the largest RNA virus genome as an infectious bacterial artificial chromosome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.97.10.5516
- The paper
- Almazán, F., González, J. M., Pénzes, Z., Izeta, A., Calvo, E., Plana-Durán, J., & Enjuanes, L. (2000). Engineering the largest RNA virus genome as an infectious bacterial artificial chromosome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.10.5516
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.