The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cloning and characterization of the mammalian brain-specific, Mg 2+ -dependent neutral sphingomyelinase
Open accessAbstract
The enzymatic breakdown of sphingomyelin by sphingomyelinases is considered the major source of the second messenger ceramide. Studies on the contribution of the various described acidic and neutral sphingomyelinases to the signaling pool of ceramide have been hampered by the lack of molecular data on the neutral sphingomyelinases (nSMases). We recently identified a mammalian nSMase, an integral membrane protein with remote similarity to bacterial sphingomyelinases. However, its ubiquitous expression pattern is in contrast to previous findings that sphingomyelinase activity is found mainly in brain tissues. By using an improved database search method, combined with phylogenetic analysis, we identified a second mammalian nSMase (nSMase2) with predominant expression in the brain. The sphingomyelinase activity of nSMase2 has a neutral pH optimum, depends on Mg 2+ ions, and is activated by unsaturated fatty acids and phosphatidylserine. Immunofluorescence reveals a neuron-specific punctate perinuclear staining, which colocalizes with a Golgi marker in a number of cell lines. The likely identity of nSMase2 with cca1, a rat protein involved in contact inhibition of 3Y1 fibroblasts, suggests a role for this enzyme in cell cycle arrest. Both mammalian nSMases are members of a superfamily of Mg 2+ -dependent phosphohydrolases, which also contains nucleases, inositol phosphatases, and bacterial toxins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Principles of bioactive lipid signalling: lessons from sphingolipids
Hannun, Y. A., & Obeid, L. M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2329 · Cited by 3,333
Ceramide in apoptosis: an overview and current perspectives
Pettus, B. J., Chalfant, C. E., & Hannun, Y. A. (2002) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids · doi:10.1016/s1388-1981(02)00331-1 · Cited by 788
Therapeutically harnessing extracellular vesicles
Cheng, L., & Hill, A. F. (2022) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-022-00410-w · Cited by 737
Arachidonic acid: Physiological roles and potential health benefits – A review
Tallima, H., & El Ridi, R. (2018) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2017.11.004 · Cited by 671
Lara-Tejero, M., & Galán, J. E. (2001) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.69.7.4358-4365.2001 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Hofmann, K., Tomiuk, S., Wolff, G., & Stoffel, W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-05-23
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5895-5900
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1966929992
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cloning and characterization of the mammalian brain-specific, Mg 2+ -dependent neutral sphingomyelinase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.97.11.5895
- The paper
- Hofmann, K., Tomiuk, S., Wolff, G., & Stoffel, W. (2000). Cloning and characterization of the mammalian brain-specific, Mg 2+ -dependent neutral sphingomyelinase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.11.5895
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.