The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Auditory processing parallels reading abilities in adults
Open accessAbstract
A broad battery of psychoacoustic measures and standard measures of reading and spelling were applied to 102 adults. The test group included individuals with a childhood history of reading difficulties and controls with no reported reading difficulties. Reading scores were variable in both groups. Poor auditory processing abilities were recorded in poor readers; particular difficulties were posed by tasks requiring spectral distinctions, the simplest of which was pure tone frequency discrimination. In absolute terms, the greatest deficits were recorded in tasks in which stimuli were presented in brief forms and in rapid succession. Auditory processing abilities accounted for more than 50% of the reading score variance in the control group, but their correlation with reading scores was lower in the group with childhood histories of reading difficulties. The additional variability in the latter group resulted largely from the prevalence of reading-compensated poor psychoacoustic performers, whose short-term word memory was also typically poor. Taken together, these findings support a link between impaired auditory resolution and poor reading. Psychoacoustic difficulties are largely retained through adulthood and may be the source of the retained reading difficulties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tallal, P., Miller, S. L., Bedi, G., Byma, G., Wang, X., Nagarajan, S. S., Schreiner, C., Jenkins, W. M., & Merzenich, M. M. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5245.81 · Cited by 1,197
Self-citationTemporal Processing Deficits of Language-Learning Impaired Children Ameliorated by Training
Merzenich, M. M., Jenkins, W. M., Johnston, P., Schreiner, C., Miller, S. L., & Tallal, P. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5245.77 · Cited by 1,000
Self-citationAttentional control of early perceptual learning.
Ahissar, M., & Hochstein, S. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.12.5718 · Cited by 497
Self-citation
Cited by
Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults
Ramus, F. (2003) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awg076 · Cited by 1,504
Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons
Ulanovsky, N., Las, L., & Nelken, I. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1032 · Cited by 1,049
Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex
Ahissar, E., Nagarajan, S., Ahissar, M., Protopapas, A., Mahncke, H., & Merzenich, M. M. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.201400998 · Cited by 538
Self-citationSyka, J. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00002.2002 · Cited by 369
Comorbidity of Auditory Processing, Language, and Reading Disorders
Sharma, M., Purdy, S. C., & Kelly, A. S. (2009) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0226 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahissar, M., Protopapas, A., Reid, M., & Merzenich, M. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-06-06
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6832-6837
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2162129166
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Auditory processing parallels reading abilities in adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.97.12.6832
- The paper
- Ahissar, M., Protopapas, A., Reid, M., & Merzenich, M. M. (2000). Auditory processing parallels reading abilities in adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.12.6832
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.