Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 343

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unbinding forces of single antibody-antigen complexes correlate with their thermal dissociation rates

Open access
Schwesinger, Falk, Ros, Robert, Strunz, Torsten, Anselmetti, Dario, Güntherodt, Hans-Joachim, Honegger, Annemarie, Jermutus, Lutz, Tiefenauer, Louis, Plückthun, Andreas·2000·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Point mutants of three unrelated antifluorescein antibodies were constructed to obtain nine different single-chain Fv fragments, whose on-rates, off-rates, and equilibrium binding affinities were determined in solution. Additionally, activation energies for unbinding were estimated from the temperature dependence of the off-rate in solution. Loading rate-dependent unbinding forces were determined for single molecules by atomic force microscopy, which extrapolated at zero force to a value close to the off-rate measured in solution, without any indication for multiple transition states. The measured unbinding forces of all nine mutants correlated well with the off-rate in solution, but not with the temperature dependence of the reaction, indicating that the same transition state must be crossed in spontaneous and forced unbinding and that the unbinding path under load cannot be too different from the one at zero force. The distance of the transition state from the ground state along the unbinding pathway is directly proportional to the barrier height, regardless of the details of the binding site, which most likely reflects the elasticity of the protein in the unbinding process. Atomic force microscopy thus can be a valuable tool for the characterization of solution properties of protein-ligand systems at the single molecule level, predicting relative off-rates, potentially of great value for combinatorial chemistry and biology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.97.18.9972

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 343

Metadata

Authors
Schwesinger, F., Ros, R., Strunz, T., Anselmetti, D., Güntherodt, H.-J., Honegger, A., Jermutus, L., Tiefenauer, L., & Plückthun, A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2000-08-29
Volume
97
Issue
18
Pages
9972-9977
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2102679108
Cited by
343
References
2
FWCI
12.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unbinding forces of single antibody-antigen complexes correlate with their thermal dissociation rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.97.18.9972
The paper
Schwesinger, F., Ros, R., Strunz, T., Anselmetti, D., Güntherodt, H.-J., Honegger, A., Jermutus, L., Tiefenauer, L., & Plückthun, A. (2000). Unbinding forces of single antibody-antigen complexes correlate with their thermal dissociation rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.18.9972

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.