The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Binding Affinities of Host–Guest, Protein–Ligand, and Protein–Transition‐State Complexes
Open accessAbstract
The affinities of hosts—ranging from small synthetic cavitands to large proteins—for organic molecules are well documented. The average association constants for the binding of organic molecules by cyclodextrins, synthetic hosts, and albumins in water, as well as of catalytic antibodies or enzymes for substrates are 10 3.5±2.5 M−1. Binding affinities are elevated to 10 8±2 M−1 for the complexation of transition states and biological antigens by antibodies or inhibitors by enzymes, and to 10 16±4 M−1 for transition states with enzymes. The origins of the distributions of association constants observed for the broad range of host–guest systems are explored in this Review, and typical approaches to compute and analyze host–guest binding in solution are discussed. In many classes of complexes a rough correlation is found between the binding affinity and the surface area that is buried upon complexation. Enzymes transcend this effect and achieve transition‐state binding much greater than is expected from the surface areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kollman, P. A., Massova, I., Reyes, C., Kuhn, B., Huo, S., Chong, L., Lee, M., Lee, T., Duan, Y., Wang, W., et al. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar000033j · Cited by 4,978
Principles of protein-protein interactions
Jones, S., & Thornton, J. M. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.1.13 · Cited by 2,684
Radzicka, A., & Wolfenden, R. (1996) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja954077c · Cited by 484
Cited by
Dynamic Combinatorial Chemistry
Corbett, P. T., Leclaire, J., Vial, L., West, K. R., Wietor, J.-L., Sanders, J. K. M., & Otto, S. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020452p · Cited by 1,922
Nam, S., & Mooney, D. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00798 · Cited by 764
Dong, Z., Sun, Y., Chu, J., Zhang, X., & Deng, H. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.7b07392 · Cited by 282
Self-citationSmith, A. J. T., Zhang, X., Leach, A. G., & Houk, K. N. (2009) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm800498e · Cited by 193
Self-citationGlas, A., Bier, D., Hahne, G., Rademacher, C., Ottmann, C., & Grossmann, T. N. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201310082 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Houk, K. N., Leach, A. G., Kim, S. P., & Zhang, X.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-10-15
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 4872-4897
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W2164050728
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Binding Affinities of Host–Guest, Protein–Ligand, and Protein–Transition‐State Complexes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.200200565
- The paper
- Houk, K. N., Leach, A. G., Kim, S. P., & Zhang, X. (2003). Binding Affinities of Host–Guest, Protein–Ligand, and Protein–Transition‐State Complexes. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200200565
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.