Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reprogramming of telomerase activity and rebuilding of telomere length in cloned cattle

Open access
Betts, Dean H., Bordignon, Vilceu, Hill, Jonathan R., Winger, Quinton, Westhusin, Mark E., Smith, Lawrence C., King, W. Allan·2001·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Nuclear reprogramming requires the removal of epigenetic modifications imposed on the chromatin during cellular differentiation and division. The mammalian oocyte can reverse these alterations to a state of totipotency, allowing the production of viable cloned offspring from somatic cell nuclei. To determine whether nuclear reprogramming is complete in cloned animals, we assessed the telomerase activity and telomere length status in cloned embryos, fetuses, and newborn offspring derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer. In this report, we show that telomerase activity was significantly ( P < 0.05) diminished in bovine fibroblast donor cells compared with embryonic stem-like cells, and surprisingly was 16-fold higher in fetal fibroblasts compared with adult fibroblasts ( P < 0.05). Cell passaging and culture periods under serum starvation conditions significantly decreased telomerase activity by approximately 30–50% compared with nontreated early passage cells ( P < 0.05). Telomere shortening was observed during in vitro culture of bovine fetal fibroblasts and in very late passages of embryonic stem-like cells. Reprogramming of telomerase activity was apparent by the blastocyst stage of postcloning embryonic development, and telomere lengths were longer (15–23 kb) in cloned fetuses and offspring than the relatively short mean terminal restriction fragment lengths (14–18 kb) observed in adult donor cells. Overall, telomere lengths of cloned fetuses and newborn calves (≈20 kb) were not significantly different from those of age-matched control animals ( P > 0.05). These results demonstrate that cloned embryos inherit genomic modifications acquired during the donor nuclei's in vivo and in vitro period but are subsequently reversed during development of the cloned animal.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.98.3.1077

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Betts, D. H., Bordignon, V., Hill, J. R., Winger, Q., Westhusin, M. E., Smith, L. C., & King, W. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2001-01-16
Volume
98
Issue
3
Pages
1077-1082
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2093568869
Cited by
161
References
14
FWCI
12.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reprogramming of telomerase activity and rebuilding of telomere length in cloned cattle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.98.3.1077
The paper
Betts, D. H., Bordignon, V., Hill, J. R., Winger, Q., Westhusin, M. E., Smith, L. C., & King, W. A. (2001). Reprogramming of telomerase activity and rebuilding of telomere length in cloned cattle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.3.1077

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.