Acetylcholine receptor channel structure in the resting, open, and desensitized states probed with the substituted-cysteine-accessibility method
Open accessAbstract
The nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptors cycle among classes of nonconducting resting states, conducting open states, and nonconducting desensitized states. We previously probed the structure of the mouse-muscle ACh receptor channel in the resting state obtained in the absence of agonist and in the open states obtained after brief exposure to ACh. We now have probed the structure in the stable desensitized state obtained after many minutes of exposure to ACh. Muscle-type receptor has the subunit composition alpha(2)betagammadelta. Each subunit has four membrane-spanning segments, M1-M4. The channel lumen in the membrane domain is lined largely by M2 and to a lesser extent by M1 from each of the subunits. We determined the rates of reaction of a small, sulfhydryl-specific, charged reagent, 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate with cysteines substituted for residues in alphaM2 and the alphaM1-M2 loop in the desensitized state and compared these rates to rates previously obtained in the resting and open states. The reaction rates of the substituted cysteines are different in the three functional states of the receptor, indicating significant structural differences. By comparing the rates of reaction of extracellularly and intracellularly added 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate, we previously located the closed gate in the resting state between alphaG240 and alphaT244, in the predicted M1-M2 loop at the intracellular end of M2. Now, we have located the closed gate in the stable desensitized state between alphaG240 and alphaL251. The gate in the desensitized state includes the resting state gate and an extension further into M2.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Galzi, J. L., Revah, F., Bouet, F., Menez, A., Goeldner, M., Hirth, C. & Changeux, J. P. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 5051-5055.
- Bertrand, D., Devillers-Thiery, A., Revah, F., Galzi, J. L., Hussy, N., Mulle, C., Bertrand, S., Ballivet, M. & Changeux, J. P. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 1261-1265.
- Javitch, J. A., Li, X., Kaback, J. & Karlin, A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10355-10359.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Desensitization of neuronal nicotinic receptors
Quick, M. W., & Lester, R. A. J. (2002) · Journal of Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/neu.10109 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Anesthetics target interfacial transmembrane sites in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors
Forman, S. A., Chiara, D. C., & Miller, K. W. (2015) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.10.002 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Sites of alcohol and volatile anesthetic action on glycine receptors
Lobo, I. A., & Harris, R. A. (2005) · International Review of Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7742(04)65003-3 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Li, P., & Akk, G. (2008) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/bjp.2008.309 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wilson, G. G., & Karlin, A.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- ORCID
- Karlin, Arthur
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-01-16
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1241-1248
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC14739
- OpenAlex
- W2136035575
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ns007065-37)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS07065)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Keywords
- nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, desensitized state, resting state, open state, channel gating, substituted cysteine accessibility, alpha subunit, channel structure
- MeSH terms
- Acetylcholine, Animals, Cysteine, Ethyl Methanesulfonate, Lidocaine, Membrane Potentials, Models, Molecular, Oocytes, Receptors, Cholinergic, Recombinant Proteins, Xenopus, Ion Channel Gating, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Protein Structure, Secondary, Muscle, Skeletal, Amino Acid Substitution, Protein Subunits, Mice, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review